is totally fucked, and too many people think that the only legitimate way to create change is by playing within the lines that were drawn almost 230 years ago. this is misguided, and i think fairly obvious. if it was possible to create change from within the system, i think that almost two and a half centuries of existance would have changed
(
Read more... )
Additionally, I think the reason why third parties are successful is because they aren't sensationalist enough. Let's face it, in the society we live in, the story about Britney Spears or Anna Nicole will always be read before the story about Iraq or a political candidate. We love our celebrities. So, yes, you're correct in saying that the media is unfairly balanced against third party candidates, but I don't think it has to be that way. One of the factors that got Jesse Ventura elected was that he was a sensationalist celebrity, and while that may not have worked out so hot for MN, it DID get a third party candidate elected. The first step to getting a third party politican is getting him recognized as a candidate, which means raising brand awareness. And while the statement is exactly true in this case, I can't but think that "there is no such thing as bad publicity."
Let's face it, the reason why we know the major two party candidates so well right now is because they're on the news. Third party candidates need to get themselves on there.
Reply
probably not. enough said.
Reply
Leave a comment