WK4/TC4

[light_on]

LAST TIME on TRIBES III.

Nicolle and Sarah were eliminated in the Cornucopia. When Liz auto-rose to power, she saught revenge by branding Casey. After everyone linked together, Drew was left at the bottom of the totem pole, branded next to Casey for the Cornucopia. The fight for the first Regency Arrow began, with Austin of District 3 as the

Comments

[light_on]

GROUP QUESTION #2
- During votes like this, where one District is down to a solo participant, and the other person still has their District partner... what are the advantages/disadvantages of keeping one or the other?
- After tonight, we will be at our F11. Is this a crucial or insignificant vote for you tonight?

Deadline: Wednesday, May 16th at 3:59 p.m. EDT

[dingdongdead]

that is such a hard question!! i don't know how well my brain is functioning at this moment but i'll do my best. i think that it depends more on the player than weather or not they have a partner. if the player has a partner and is in an alliance with that partner or in a large alliance in general i think it would be more advantageous to vote that player out. if the player with a partner is not in an alliance with their partner, but the player without a partner is in a large alliance, it would be more advantageous to vote out the single player who is part of a large alliance. if neither player is part of a large alliance, i think it would be most advantageous to vote out the person with a partner because that will not only eliminate a player but will also leave the remaining teammate more vulnerable

[fauxappletree]

You can take in a single player and gain momentum in your alliance or you can vote out a pair and take out two threats at once.

The vote is crucial, except that it's pretty much a done deal.

[malchikgay]

GOTDAM too many questions!

I think it could be more advantageous to leave solo players for themselves at this moment. They may end up being more of an asset down the road.

F11 still seems like a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG way away, so I don't think this is a big deal, even though a great player leaves either way.

[philadon]

More about the trust of the duo than the individual.

Every vote is crucial?

[neutrals]

i think that it's easier to go after the people who don't have partners and it will be good to get rid of those districts. the only advantage to splitting up the teams is getting rid of alliances or making it easier to get through to the end.