don't judge a book by it's cover . . .
here are some links to what are apparently the new covers of the uglies trilogy by scott westerfeld. they are the UK versions, it turns out. the covers may be triggery, no joke.
uglies: this one i kind of get, in the context of the books, though it still bothers me
pretties: the cover only link isn't working
specials: book three. i can't even.
i cannot ... explain my disgust and hatred for them. i suppose i might have not been up just by the uglies cover, but the last two don't even make *sense*. plus they are sensationalistic in a super disturbing way. i would not want my kid picking up that copy of specials, and i have to say, i'm really glad i have the old set.
i am so disturbed. really.
does anyone know why they would go this way? or why new covers were even necessary? please, someone, help me understand!! especially if these make sense in some way, or something! because right now, i'm ready to puke.
ETA2: should work now!! thanks!!
ETA3: this is the cover for "extras": again. don't get it.
uglies: this one i kind of get, in the context of the books, though it still bothers me
pretties: the cover only link isn't working
specials: book three. i can't even.
i cannot ... explain my disgust and hatred for them. i suppose i might have not been up just by the uglies cover, but the last two don't even make *sense*. plus they are sensationalistic in a super disturbing way. i would not want my kid picking up that copy of specials, and i have to say, i'm really glad i have the old set.
i am so disturbed. really.
does anyone know why they would go this way? or why new covers were even necessary? please, someone, help me understand!! especially if these make sense in some way, or something! because right now, i'm ready to puke.
ETA2: should work now!! thanks!!
ETA3: this is the cover for "extras": again. don't get it.