Sep 18, 2014 18:19
Hello fellow Martin Freeman fans,
is anybody out there who saw Martin as Richard III on stage at Trafalgar studios in London and wants to discuss/share his opinion? I saw the play last week and thought it was terrific. And I would love to share my thoughts with other fans!
theatre: misc
Leave a comment
I also found it fascinating that they used the same stage design for the whole play, but it still felt different and new in the various scenes, with every change of the superb costumes it felt like they had changed the whole scenerie.
And I definitely loved Martin Freeman als Richard and thought he was terrific. I´m a relatively new fan of Martin Freeman and I had seen him only in one other role besides Dr. Watson, in Love actually. And to be honest I didn´t know what to expect with him playing Richard III, maybe the badest villain in theatre hostory. But he really blew me away with his performance, in my opinion he portrayed Richard as a mean, devious, nastily sarcastic and sometimes even wittily grotesque, but immensely cruel psychpath, and he did it so, so well in my opinion. I also have to admit that I didn´t see much appeal in the seduction scene with Lady Anne, but even when I read the play before seeing it on stage I couldn´t comprehend why Lady Anne gave into Richard´s courting. But Richard´s scenes with Queen Elisabeth and the Duchess of York were absolutely brilliant, those were the scenes when I actually forgot I was watching a play and thought it was a real confrontation between brother/sister-in-law and mother and son, fiery, stirring and authentic.
There also was one very special moment for me in the play when Richard was killing Anne on a desk in a very long and disturbingly cruel scene, because in the scene while he was choking his wife to death Martin Freeman was staring right at (or probably more accurate) through me because I sat right in his view in the second row and the seat in front of me was free. It was such an intense and terrifing moment that I began feeling truly uncomfortable and anxious. I looked at my husband then and he felt as uncomfortable as I did because it was really like witnessing a true crime and a psychotic mass murder at work. But then for me it´s always the best theatre experience when it feels like watching a real scene with real people instead of actors and when I feel and live through all the emotions and sentiment showed on stage by myself.
After the show on our way to the bus station we saw some of the actors coming from a certain direction and we went there to have a look. There was a rather small waiting crowd and we decided to wait for a few minutes to see if Martin Freeman was coming out too. He did come out quickly and very patiently and politely signed all the papers the fans gave him. I thanked him for a terriific performance and he thanked me for complimenting him and we smiled at each other and it was a bit surreal, but all in all a rather unforgettable and unique experience and the one regret I have is that I didn´t bought tickets for two shows during our stay because I would have loved to see the play again and be able to pay attention to more details and finer nuances.
So now I hope I didn´t bore anybody to death with my long report, but I´m still in a very enthusiastic mood and very happy to talk about this outstanding experience.
Reply
Warning for slight Richard III spoilers. I recently journeyed from Hollywood, California, with my friend and my daughter, for a week in London that included seeing Richard III at Trafalgar Studios. We were Row A center on July 16, and Row C center the following night. Am glad to be able to say that the show exceeded our high expectations, and what a treat it was to observe and enjoy Martin Freeman's superb acting up close. As edited and directed by Jamie Lloyd, it's a fast-paced, action-packed adaptation... with Richard doing a slow build from sly manipulator to ruthless murderer as the show progresses. And the humor... there are many laugh-out-loud moments, perfectly timed... although by play's end, no one is laughing. Martin Freeman is known for giving different deliveries for each take or performance, and that held true for this production. Some lines were delivered by him from different parts of the stage than the night before. And, for example, the famous "a horse, a horse" line was played entirely for laughs the first night (he squeaked it out in a high-pitched voice), and more traditionally the second night. His changes in delivery and/or position seemed carefully done so as not to throw off the other actors. By staging the murders onstage, Lloyd really brings home just how ugly and vicious was Richard's rise to the top (and attempt to stay there)... the dead die horribly, and bodies were laying inches from our feet in the front row. Richard, despite his withered arm and hump back, initially lets others do his dirty work for him, but later proves to be a savage fighter, leaping over furniture (gasps from the audience), and killing mercilessly with his bare hands. It was riveting... and exhausting! One of the evenings, we met Martin later at the stage door, and he was very polite and soft-spoken, interacting with everyone before leaving in his private car.
Reply
Reply
Are you going to see Benedict cumberbatch as Hamlet next year too?
Reply
There are a lot of fan reviews (and photos of stage door autographing and such) posted on the tumblr Martin Freeman tag if you want to read more. Some are very touching, and it's fascinating how many people have traveled from all over the world. On the two nights we went, we met a mother and daughter who were there from South Korea.
There was an article posted online a few days ago (I think The Mirror UK but not sure) saying that something like 55% of the audience has been first-time theatregoers. That was one of their goals (to incite people to see Shakespeare who had never seen it before, and to make it exciting for them) and I think they met that goal ably.
I am not enough of a Benedict Cumberbatch fan to care if I see him or not in Hamlet, so I am not planning to go for that. However, the same friend (also from California) with whom I saw RIII (and my daughter also went with us) has already bought her Hamlet tickets. Are you going?
A few years ago my friend and I went to London for a week and while there attended the first BFI event where they showed an episode before it aired (it was the first episode of Season 2, w/Irene Adler), with a Q&A. Benedict Cumberbatch was there and we met him briefly (ditto Mark Gatiss, Andrew Scott, Louise Brealey). Unfortunately, Martin was not at that event because he was in New Zealand filming The Hobbit. But meeting them is not that big a deal to me... for RIII it was really all about seeing the performance.
p.s. A few years ago, for two weeks I stayed with friends who live in the village of Grünberg. Do you know that area? They took me all over to see wonderful sights... a Rhine cruise, Heidelberg, and much more (a different place every day). I had a wonderful time.
Reply
I also read the article about the high percentage of first-time theatregoers in Richard III and I was quite surprised about that fact. In our performance there had been a lot of middle aged couples like my husband and me, a lot of families and not too many young people and not significantly more women. But maybe it has been a rather untypical audience this evening, because there also hadn´t been too many people waiting at the stage door. I saw some other Germans in the audience again who had also been at Speedy´s in the afternoon, and some other Germans were waiting at the stage door with me. I guess there really had been a lot of people traveling to London to see this play. Having been a true fan of the BBC series Sherlock only since May this year I didn´t realise how popular Martin Freeman is around the world and I´m really happy that the play had been such a success for him, even though he said it had been rather strenuous and demanding.
I find it kind of refreshing that you are not enough of a fan of Benedict Cumberbatch to go see him as Hamlet, because I always have the feeling that he is so much more popular than Martin Freeman and that makes me sad because I absolutely like them equally. I think they are both excellent actors, both interesting, intelligent men and they have a wonderful and unique chemistry on screen and one would´t work so well without the other. But when I joined a Sherlock fanforum 4 months ago I was surprised to see that most of the members are gushing and swooning over Benedict, raving about every new picture, every new project, every new interview, but nobody is really interested in Martin´s interviews, projects etc. Only 3 members so far have seen Richard III, but at least 50 people have already tickets for Hamlet. I have tickets for Hamlet myself and I´m definitely looking forward to it, but I always feel a little unhappy when Martin is somehow neglected. And just today there were some photos of Benedict Cumberbatch as Richard III for the BBC´s Hollow Crown series and I thought that Martin looked so much better in that role, much more convincing, interesting and menacing.
And concerning new projects, have you any news on Martin´s new film project "American Hangman"? Do you know what kind of role he will have in this film?
Oh wow, this is a really long post, I hope you don´t mind, but I´m just so happy to have found another person who wants to talk about the brilliant Martin Freeman!!
Reply
I can take or leave BC. He's a good actor and of course I like him in Sherlock. But I have no special interest in him. I subscribe to tumblr blogs that focus on MF, although some BC creeps in there, too. Did you listen to the funny BBC radio show skits about BC getting involved in all of MF's projects? Can send links to you.
I can send you my email and we can talk further there if you want...
Just read a really nice, detailed new review of RIII on tumblr and can send it to you.
Reply
Leave a comment