I know I'll get a sensible answer from you. I have not from anyone else I've asked about this.
Why do you think we have a right to know about this? The public being interested s not the sam as being in the public interest. Do you think there is any right to privacy? You may be quite accurate in your description of Giggs, but he is not the only person who would have felt pain had this been plastered over the front pages of the papers.
The press wax lyrical over freedom of the press and the fact that only the rich and famous can get super-injunctions. Their outrage is not about freedom of the press it is about MONEY, and to be blunt only the rich and famous need super-injunctions because the press don't write about the the foibles of anyone else.
I have little sympathy for Giggs, but I do for his family and his kids and lets face it, its takes two to tango and there is something offensive out of Miss Stubbs using her 'indiscretion' to try to make money.
It is not about pain. When Giggs and his likes say that they want to avoid giving pain to their families, what they mean is that they want to avoid pain themselves - from a rolling-pin massage to a divorce with shark lawyer sauce. In other words, they are trying to do the deed and avoid the punishment. And is there a single reason why an adulterer should not be publicly known as such?
Yes sorry about the error - my point about Miss Thomas stands.
Is there a single reason why an adulterer should be rewarded (paid) for telling the world about their deed? And do we really need to know all the detils? Lets not pretend that there is any moral aspect to what the papaers do, once you go beyond the words Miss Thomas and Ryan Giggs committed adultary the only purpose is to tittilate the public and make more money.
I don't care about Giggs and any pain he might suffer - its the added humiliation and sadness that his family would be put through as a result of the type of stories that would be written that concern me. Frankly its none of our bleeding business.
Actually, I'm not so much enraged at Mr.Giggs as the outrage against free speech being perpetrated by the whole legal profession in Britain. It is becoming easier and easier for any rich person to shut down discussion of their crimes or misdemeanours. This has to stop.
AND HOW THE FUCK WOULD YOU KNOW THAT A CRIME HAS BEEN COMMITTED IF THE JUDICIARY CONSPIRE WITH THE CRIMINALS TO COVER IT UP??????????
Your confidence in the honesty and decendy of rich and powerful people is rather naive, and does not take into account the ways such people usually tend to become rich and powerful. Such men are always to be dreaded, and half of any properly democratic legislation must tend to break the weapons they inevitably have.
Comments 38
Why do you think we have a right to know about this? The public being interested s not the sam as being in the public interest. Do you think there is any right to privacy? You may be quite accurate in your description of Giggs, but he is not the only person who would have felt pain had this been plastered over the front pages of the papers.
The press wax lyrical over freedom of the press and the fact that only the rich and famous can get super-injunctions. Their outrage is not about freedom of the press it is about MONEY, and to be blunt only the rich and famous need super-injunctions because the press don't write about the the foibles of anyone else.
I have little sympathy for Giggs, but I do for his family and his kids and lets face it, its takes two to tango and there is something offensive out of Miss Stubbs using her 'indiscretion' to try to make money.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Is there a single reason why an adulterer should be rewarded (paid) for telling the world about their deed? And do we really need to know all the detils? Lets not pretend that there is any moral aspect to what the papaers do, once you go beyond the words Miss Thomas and Ryan Giggs committed adultary the only purpose is to tittilate the public and make more money.
I don't care about Giggs and any pain he might suffer - its the added humiliation and sadness that his family would be put through as a result of the type of stories that would be written that concern me. Frankly its none of our bleeding business.
Reply
-mrmandias
Reply
Reply
Reply
Your confidence in the honesty and decendy of rich and powerful people is rather naive, and does not take into account the ways such people usually tend to become rich and powerful. Such men are always to be dreaded, and half of any properly democratic legislation must tend to break the weapons they inevitably have.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment