So, tomorrow morning, you wake up in King Arthur's England. Let's skip some of the obvious major problems, somehow magically, you DO speak olde english
( Read more... )
The whole bit about medieval people being so superstitious that they'd take you for a demon or a witch just because you're dressed funny? Pretty much bogus. Propaganda written by the smug intelligentsia of the "Enlightenment" era. For a better read on medieval culture, watch Terry Jones' Medieval Lives (yes, the Python Terry Jones).
Also, maybe getting too much into it, but the approximate year makes a big difference in a number of ways, not least technology. For instance, if you're thinking of a post-Imperial Arthur (6th c.) they may not have had stirrups; if you're thinking of a very late Arthur (14th+) they have longbows and full plate armor and perhaps guns.
Well, I was taking it a little beyond "dressed oddly". The fabrics we wear today are different, the closure mechanisms were not invented yet, the styles might seem obscene, or there might have been a thousand other problems with showing up in year 1000 england dressed in modern clothes.
Lensmaking would be freaking awesome (and necessary for my myopic self) but I don't know anything aside from the most basic aspects of concave/convex lenses. I'd hope to make friends with the glazier.
Also, maybe getting too much into it, but the approximate year makes a big difference in a number of ways, not least technology. For instance, if you're thinking of a post-Imperial Arthur (6th c.) they may not have had stirrups; if you're thinking of a very late Arthur (14th+) they have longbows and full plate armor and perhaps guns.
Reply
And, yeah, let's go with 1000 ad.
I will watch medieval lives.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment