On my last post, a lot of people made the completely valid point that SSM is a serious erosion of the institution of marriage. Specifically, it moves the focus of the institution from procreation and continuity of inheritance and makes the institution of marriage about "love". Romantic "Love" being a notably fickle beast, one can reliably predict
(
Read more... )
No good options, so pick the least bad one. That's SSM.
That's America, really, when you look at history. We've always been inefficient, whacking it together any way that works because we'd seen what attempts at “efficiency” had produced and the cure is far worse than the disease. [The 20th century had no shortage of examples, thanks to socialism in its various malign forms. Yeah, I gotcher plan right here…]
That's why I favor same-sex marriage despite being a Republican - because I'm a Goldwater Republican, a Reagan Republican, and I believe that people should mind their own business and be free to do so.
Edited to add:
On the other hand, the institution of ten thousand years is not overthrown
in a day, even by unelected unaccountable democracy-short-circuiting
court order - I have a lesbian friend who is “married” to the woman
she's living with, and I say it that way (tho' never to her!) because I see
it that way, as make-believe, not real grown-up milepost-in-life marriage.
[I mistyped that male-believe, which is not ( ... )
Reply
it that way, as make-believe, not real grown-up milepost-in-life marriage.
I think this will happen a lot more than SS marriage folks will want.
Reply
Tell that to the people who've lost their jobs/businesses due the bullying of the Rainbow Crowd.
Reply
Seems rather a pointless undertaking.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment