[CFUW Game 11 goes here!]

[for_the_han]

Seeing as how you're one of the few players present who might actually play intelligently, I might as well take the risk and seek you out, Nishi. If you want to trust me or are feeling as reckless as I am, that is.

Comments

[death_2_parrots]

What? You weren't impressed by the chain logic? I was. I think that's the first time she's managed hold attention long enough to write at such length.

Interesting. Considering the 'risk,' I'm assuming you have something in mind?

[for_the_han]

Heh.

Well, considering Ari and Yu Long, I think I've had enough "Let's vote Nishi out" to last a lifetime. Considering my own blind bias got Xingba ousted -- I was stupid enough to think that he wouldn't actually go up to vote, and the voting had actually gone up before I had a chance to change -- I'd like to prevent it from happening again, if at all possible.

[death_2_parrots]

As much as I'd like to implicate Ishida, true, I don't think either were our predators. It was a wasted round. Still, I see what you're getting at, so let me see if I have the point... As is, if I go up for an outsing, I'm as good as gone. You're offering protection or at least a bit of sway.

So, what are you asking in return?

[for_the_han]

Hopefully, this round we can actually keep our mind on the clues. But what about the round after? And the round after that?

Well, for starters, I'd like to know that you're not a wolf, but I suppose I couldn't really trust a statement of "I'm not a wolf," can I? But I would still be interested in what you think about everyone else. Who's acting wolfish. Who you think might be acting suspicious but not actually be wolves. Personally, I think there are more people behaving suspiciously than there are wolves.

Reckless? Why not.

[death_2_parrots]

Heh, am I the only one noticing discrepancies?

Re: Reckless? Why not.

[for_the_han]

Hm? I've been fairly absent this round, but what do you mean?

Re: Reckless? Why not.

[death_2_parrots]

You might want to, it brings all the females to scrutiny.

Now, I might be not a veteran of these games... but how often does a clue implicate half if not more of the remaining group this early? Especially since the previous ones have been rather specific.

A long period of no show with a clue, and 'passed on' through someone else... Well, considering the pattern of kills, I don't blame them for sitting on a clue... just a few little things are combining... or maybe I'm just unduely paranoid.

Re: Reckless? Why not.

[for_the_han]

Not very often, but it's happened. When it was misinterpreted, we very nearly lost the game.

What little things do you think are combining?