I like it. It's a nice portrayal of the serious side of the show. And it's something that could happen. After all, there is the one escaped serial killer, plus whatever criminal mastermind is behind Beckett's mother's death. Realistically it has to happen at some point (whether it ever actually happens on show is another question). It's definitely in character though. So yeah. Well done.
Thank you! I was a little uncomfortable exploring certain things because I am so behind on the show itself that I wouldn't necessarily know what to do, which was a roadblock I encountered when I tried writing other stories. Then this one happened, and I think it worked better. And yes! REALISTICALLY, they don't solve every crime. I get that you can't have that happen often on a crime procedural, but it would be nice to see it every so often.
That's true. I always forget that you're behind. I assume the ones they don't solve are the ones we don't see, maybe? IDK. I have no explanation. Maybe we will see them not solve another one at some point, a non serial-killer based one.
Yes, I'm tricky like that! I can work with your theory, mostly because it makes me feel better about it. (It's funny though, on TM I want there to be a multi-ep serial killer arc where we actually DO get to see them solve it!)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Multi-ep case could be fun on TM, that is true. OR JUST DEAL WITH THE UNFINISHED STORYLINES THEY ALREADY HAVE. Ahem. No, not bitter.
Reply
Leave a comment