Sherlock - The Great Game
Of course I loved it, will watch it again 300 times, pre-ordered the DVD and already unconciously started imitating The Cumb's hand movements (my boss, sitting next to me "What was that?"; really happened, haha).
( Here's some words :) )
( Here's some words :) )
Are they really bringing Moriarty back? That's, um, I'm not sure how I feel about that, tbh. If he had remained in the shadows, then totally, but Jimbo has me feeling a bit underwhelmed even after a couple of repeat watches. I thought the actor displayed some really chilling moments of creepy and crazily dangerous, but I'm still a bit meh. I did like the comparisons and likenesses they managed to convey between Sherlock and Moriarty though. I think I'd rather have them introduce (or reveal) Moran, or else have Jim be a fake!Moriarty or only part of the whole Moriarty equation. That'd make me sit up.
Sherlock's fake gunning it, eh? But what purpose would that serve in resolving the scene?
Never watched Dr. Who either, but I may need to start doing so for the fix. But as you say, it'll prolly come across as a poor imitation. I can't wait to watch the un-aired pilot episode on the DVD. And I'll be trying to catch everything the Cucumber has acted in liek evah, even if it's utter crap (which I'm sure he can't possibly be /starry-eyed fangirl).
Reply
I have to find the interview where this was said. I'll go looking tomorrow. And I could totally see Jim being a part of "Moriarty", whatever Moriarty is (more than a man and all that), and I don't mean just an organization. To be honest, I don't know what I mean (aliens, probably. NO - I've been watching too much Dr. Who).
I've watched "Stuart, a life backwards" yesterday - it was very good, I recommend it - and it really shows how versatile our boy is - you wouldn't recognize Sherlock in it :).
Oh, and the fake gunning - that would be very, very stupid :). No purpose at all, I'm afraid!
Reply
Leave a comment