Wow. That blog is a lovely example of tolerance, isn't it? Note that she's not just saying she'll shun people if they vote against what she believes; she's saying she'll shun them if they don't vote for what she believes. Then at the end, not only is she threatening vandalism and assault, but also claiming that gay people will criminally neglect their duties or misuse their power in order to punish others for their beliefs. Yes, I can't imagine why anyone wouldn't just roll over and give them what they want, when she puts it like that.
I certainly hope she doesn't speak for all gays. I hope at least some of them can conduct themselves in a more civilized way. No, I'm not condoning what the hospital supposedly did, but threatening anarchy is not the right way to get her point across.
Of course she doesn't speak for all gays, any more than any single person speaks for all of whatever subgroups they belong to.
I would say that while the measures she suggests are far outside the realm of anything I can imagine myself doing, I can at least appreciate the rage that motivates her to suggest as much.
Comments 2
I certainly hope she doesn't speak for all gays. I hope at least some of them can conduct themselves in a more civilized way. No, I'm not condoning what the hospital supposedly did, but threatening anarchy is not the right way to get her point across.
Reply
I would say that while the measures she suggests are far outside the realm of anything I can imagine myself doing, I can at least appreciate the rage that motivates her to suggest as much.
Reply
Leave a comment