Scariest Quote of the Campaign:

Jan 18, 2008 09:45

SAY WHAT?

"I believe it's a lot easier to change the Constitution than it would be to change the word of the living God. And that's what we need to do is amend the Constitution so it's in God's standards rather than trying to change God's standards so it lines up with some contemporary view of how we treat each other and how we treat the family ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 24

jkrissw January 18 2008, 17:58:15 UTC
When did he say that, and to what audience? That IS scary.

Reply

firedrake_mor January 18 2008, 18:12:53 UTC
One source, dated Tuesday:

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/15/579265.aspx

These two topics usually feature prominently in Huckabee's stump speech, but last night he got specific, promising to build a border fence within 18 months if elected and elaborating on his belief that the constitution needs to be amended.

"[Some of my opponents] do not want to change the Constitution, but I believe it's a lot easier to change the constitution than it would be to change the word of the living God, and that's what we need to do is to amend the Constitution so it's in God's standards rather than try to change God's standards," Huckabee said, referring to the need for a constitutional human life amendment and an amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman ( ... )

Reply

the_celestia January 19 2008, 00:50:00 UTC
As soon as he used the 'P' word, I lost all interest in him (along with both his stand on abortion and marriage). I'm seriously offended by the use of 'prayer' and 'god's standards' by a politician.

t_C

Reply


ngelinadb January 18 2008, 18:13:36 UTC
Honey, you just haven't been paying attention...the only good thing about Huckabee is that he's so eminently unelectable.

Reply

filkertom January 18 2008, 18:18:41 UTC
Precisely, on both counts. That was all over the news, and the blogosphere, earlier this week. Basically, everybody freaked. And Salon's War Room pointed out that Huckster's federalism is highly selective: yes for, e.g., denying abortions and gay marriages, no for, e.g., interfering with home schooling or raising the Confederate flag.

Reply

firedrake_mor January 18 2008, 18:54:58 UTC
Oh, I wouldn't have voted for him on a bet -- his position on abortion just begins the reasons I think he is not suitable to be President. I'm a sort of libertarian/progressive -- I'll be voting Democratic in the Primary, but I still haven't decided for whom ( ... )

Reply

aeddie January 18 2008, 19:08:17 UTC
Obama has as much experience in a national office as a certain Arkansas governor is a more accurate way to phrase it I think. Mr. Clinton's time as governor gave him some experience on a national level dealing with the Congress and the other states for interstate trade, international issues dealing with ports and such.

Reply


kalalanekent January 18 2008, 18:37:38 UTC
The icon, my darling, is terrifying. *dies*

The quote is even more terrifying. And there goes the last possibility of me thinking Huckabee has a shot. Forget it, my friend. Not happening.

Reply


ebenbrooks January 18 2008, 19:55:39 UTC
Oh, Huckabee is a complete fucktard. I've know that all along...

Reply

admnaismith January 18 2008, 22:53:33 UTC

And his followers are Hucktards.

Reply


czina January 18 2008, 20:17:01 UTC
Of course - this is the PERFECT reason to go vote for him in the Primary election!

I mean - Red and I have no idea who'll even be in the election when it rolls around to vote here in TX - but we may or may not register independent/Republican, just to choose the enemy for November.

Of course, come November - trained Donkey (heck, even UNtrained Donkey) at this point will be our vote - but stacking the deck with an untrained, DUMB Elephant will only help the cause.

Can you imagine the debate, if it were to be Huckabee and (fill in your Democrat here)?

Of course, it could still backfire - people DID choose the Shrub, too.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up