Feb 25, 2009 19:30
- 09:26 @ jobeaz Evaluation: There is no Web 2.0. It's all in your head. :-P #
- 10:44 @ katiedavis Mine was mostly full of bankers, businessmen, and other commercially-sanctioned successes. Gave me a bit of a complex, it did. #
- 11:36 @ jobeaz I'm deadly serious. I refuse to use the term "Web 2.0", because for me, the web has always been a social medium. #
- 11:38 @ jobeaz It would be like called a 3G mobile phone "phone 2.0". It's superfluous and confusing. #
- 11:51 @ jobeaz it's not an age thing, because your generation *invented* the technology. ;-P #
- 11:54 @ jobeaz We have always been social creatures. We have always used technology to maintain social networks. The medium has changed, that's all #
- 12:38 Some thoughts about libraries and social media. I'd be interested to know your thoughts. is.gd/kLeJ #
- 12:43 @ katykat I refuse to believe that. That's so not fair. #
- 12:53 wonders what makes something "scholarly", and why that makes it more relevant than other commentary in a field. #
- 13:19 @ polyxena ta. #
- 13:23 @ katykat that you're a bedtime snacker #
- 13:28 @ twitofalili Have you been watching Dollhouse? #
- 15:20 @ katykat not fair because you can do it and still be hot. :-P #
- 15:21 @ katykat whereas I practically starve myself, and I'm still a fatty boombah. #
- 15:47 @ zaana communal / collective / collaborative / collusion... umm... clusters of carrots? #
- 15:55 @ katykat Not for the last few months, because the weather's horrible and my bike was stolen, but I usually or cycle a lot when I can. #
Automatically shipped by
LoudTwitter