Here's a weird question: what is it, exactly, that paragraphs do in fiction? I ask because I just came across a theory that strikes me as intuitively right but hard to work out in detail. It appears in a book by Samuel R. Delany, Babel-17 (fascinating sixties sci-fi about the power of language, go read), where a character remarks, apropos of
(
Read more... )
do you think a computer with a sufficient degree of complexity to achieve sentience would necessarily be capable of boredom -- of perceiving some time as non-valuable dead time -- or could boredom be designed out of an artificial mind?
To get human-level flexibility you'd have to notice when you're getting stuck in a rut of some kind -- then acting on this perception, it would seem, would amount to boredom, functionally. Marvin Minsky had interesting things to say on the functional roles of emotions, and so on, in The Society of Mind -- my favorite kind of science book, that's written for both his peers and the public. (But his recent The Emotion Machine, er, bored me.)
OTOH I'll bet there's way more room for diversity in ways of thinking than we can imagine. Most obviously, a mind's designer might not want it to break out of certain ruts. (So to speak. *looks askance at Wilt Chamberlain*)
Reply
Leave a comment