(no subject)
A really nice article (http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/pdfs/TheUEPDv00l.pdf) explaining about the exit polling problem with the 2004 election, and how nobody has satisfactorily explained (or even unsatisfactorily explained) the discrepencies. It doesn't necessarily have to mean that the election was stolen, but that is one of the theories. With the continued absence of any other rational explanation, it becomes more and more plausible every time I look at the data and the half ass excuses given to try to explain away the glaring inconsistencies. The chance that one of the exit poll results for the three battleground states of Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania being off is on the order of 1 in 500. That all three would be outside the 99% confidence band is something on the order of 250,000,000 to 1. In statistical terms, thats absolutely impossible. Which means some pretty serious shenanigans happened, and yet there is a deafening silence to this day from the media who are supposed to be the sword and shield of the people against the tyranny of government. Once again, they let the people down, to the detriment of us all and the enrichment of their parent corporations.