TOSed. Yeah.

May 29, 2007 18:15

Okay. So I've heard back from LJ Abuse in regards to pornish_pixies. Leaving this uncut. Apologies to the flist.

Please don't be knocking LJ Abuse in any way for deleting pornish_pixies...they were very kind and very helpful in their explanation and I can see where they're coming from from a legal POV. Plus, they gave me a way to hopefully save the back comm entries. I'll be ( Read more... )

comms: pornish, 6a: strikethrough, fandom: hp

Leave a comment

scarah2 May 29 2007, 22:20:24 UTC
Dude, what about all the support comms for survivors?

Reply

werewolf_lib May 29 2007, 22:25:49 UTC
Maybe I'm just particularly bitter right now, but I wouldn't be surprised if the group rumoured to be behind this wouldn't target them as well for some wild, irrational reason.

Reply

pepperjackcandy May 29 2007, 23:26:13 UTC
I'm thinking that someone should give them a heads-up. Just in case.

Reply

jeran May 30 2007, 16:57:49 UTC
I'm wondering if some of those communites might want to not remove the tag. Let LJ face the prospect of legal action from a bunch of incest survivors it's just accused of trying to solicit exactly what they survived. I think that's what it's going to take to convince companies like SixApart that there are also costs associated with acting like this.

Reply

Here via MetaFandom ex_fandrogy May 30 2007, 19:32:15 UTC
My thoughts exactly.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up