So, I ended up getting into a really great discussion with
therealycats about RTD's Women in Doctor Who vs Moffat's Women in Doctor Who over in
this post and while replying to her comments, I realized that I was basically writing the meta that I'd been toying around with writing, so I edited my comments together to create this post. If you want to see my
(
Read more... )
We've spent two season with Amy, and I still don't know who she is. I mean, all I know is that she obsessed over the Doctor since childhood, gets married, has a baby whose existence is like the saddest thing ever, becomes a model/perfume creator (lol, what?), and really digs Vincent van Gogh. But I have no idea what she will do in any given situation. Whereas with Rose/Martha/Donna, I tend to mentally insert them into episodes because I'm always curious as to what they would do in these different situations. I just can't get that feel for Amy, even if she's in the episode.
As for River, I feel nothing but pity. I had so much hope for her when I first I first watched SitL/FotD. I didn't realize that there had to be any extra mystery surrounding her. I thought the "ordinary" mystery of introducing a new character would have been enough (why yes, I would like more adventures of a sassy space archeologist from the future. She knows these adventures, but I don't. I can't wait to see them!). But there had to be a bigger mystery that turned out to be a massive ball of "hot mess" and "do not want" with a side of "ick". And then I just feel sorry for River because her entire existence sucks and lacks any kind of free will (and that's supposed to be romantic in some way? Really now, fandom).
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment