So, I ended up getting into a really great discussion with
therealycats about RTD's Women in Doctor Who vs Moffat's Women in Doctor Who over in
this post and while replying to her comments, I realized that I was basically writing the meta that I'd been toying around with writing, so I edited my comments together to create this post. If you want to see my
(
Read more... )
As far as character development goes, if you look up and read the sections I wrote about Rose, Martha and Donna, I think that those are some good examples of the ways in which these rich characters were explored and developed. The Doctor himself has a lot of excellent character development throughout the first four series. Without going into too much detail, he starts out the show as a man who is broken by the Time War. Through his relationship with Rose, he learns how to be a bit more human and how to let people in. After losing Rose, he shuts himself off again, which is why he is kind of jerk to Martha sometimes. Then in series 4 he becomes BFFs with Donna only to lose her again. So he decides to travel alone. He's so sick of caring about people to only lose them. This culminates in "Waters of Mars" when the Doctor, so sick of losing everyone, refuses to abide by the fixed point in time and watch the Mars explorers died so tries to change history.
Reply
Reply
We're not pulling your leg. The head writer for s1-s4 (Rose, Martha, Donna) in fact gave many video commentaries and in fact wrote a 700+ page book detailing how he thought out his stories and character arcs. It was never about "being campy" for him.
I am sorry you are not seeing in the scripts what he intended, and what we see.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment