So, I ended up getting into a really great discussion with
therealycats about RTD's Women in Doctor Who vs Moffat's Women in Doctor Who over in
this post and while replying to her comments, I realized that I was basically writing the meta that I'd been toying around with writing, so I edited my comments together to create this post. If you want to see my
(
Read more... )
It almost makes it worse that I legitimately like Amy and River a lot, because I want them to have these great stories and awesome lives but they do not. I also can't get over how horrifying/messed up River's life actually is and how unacknowledged that is.
Reply
Reply
But then neither of their storylines this season worked for me. Amy's story would have been stronger to me if she'd chosen to leave in God Complex rather than be left by the Doctor. River... everything there was a hot mess.
After two seasons I feel like I like Amy, but I don't feel like I really know her. She's a ..model now, I guess, but I don't know why, etc.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
It's true that it's Gareth Roberts, so he probably deserves some of the blame. I tend to assume that anything major regarding a companion was at least looked at and approved by the showrunner, and I figured Amy's post-Doctor career would fall into that category, though given that it had absolutely 0 impact on anything I guess I could be wrong in that assumption.
To clarify, I mean that if I think something is significant to the overall plot arc and/or a major character's arc (like Amy's career), I assume the showrunner calls the shots there. A line or basic premise that makes me wince is going to fall on the head of whoever wrote the episode. For instance in "Closing Time" I think there was a line about a hot babysitter? Unnecessary, gross, and definitely Gareth Roberts, not Moffat's
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Leave a comment