[ SECRET POST #886 ]

Jun 09, 2009 16:27


⌈ Secret Post #886 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.
Read more... )

Leave a comment

fscom June 9 2009, 21:59:40 UTC
You fucking racist.

Reply

fscom June 9 2009, 22:24:50 UTC
Yes, because thinking the original version of Nick Fury that's been out in Marvel comics since the 60s deserved a spot in the movies more so than the Ultimate version which hasn't been around for a decade obviously makes you a racist. You stupid troll.

I love Samuel L. Jackson, and yes I'm damn happy that he's going to be playing the character that Marvel deliberately designed to look like him. But I was a bit disappointed that Marvel didn't give us old school Fury. He's a damn kickass character.

Reply

mechanicaljewel June 9 2009, 23:10:26 UTC
Nah. Clearly you are unfamiliar with:


... )

Reply

ship_in_harbor June 9 2009, 23:30:53 UTC
I never much cared for Fury until Ultimate (and yes I'd read a lot and seen a lot of 616!Fury).

I dunno, I guess I honestly just can't see anyone playing 616 and doing it well, so I'll take Ultimate.

Reply

tsukinofaerii June 10 2009, 12:28:56 UTC
I kind of think it was mostly an excuse to get Samuel L. Jackson into a comicbook movie. I mean, that puts it objectively high up there on the Scale of Awesome, even for those people who don't recognize the movies for the Awesome they, in fact, already are. It'll help draw in the legion of people who are all, "PPPHHSST, COMIC BOOKS. BAH." It's the same trick they use for Batman movies, except this time they can justify it.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up