Have your say!
Feedback time! As this is authoressnebula and my first awards community we'd like to know what you've thought of it so far and have your say about what happens now, as you guys are the reason we're here.
I'd like to take the opportunitly to thank everyone for taking part, Nebula of course, the panel, those who nominated..everyone! *squishes* The whole experience has been fun. And I've made some new friends in the process, which is always a bonus.
Firstly we do intend to do more rounds and from feedback I think maybe you'd like that too!
I'm already getting excited about round #2!
Next, lets cover what's already going to happen. I've started work on re-vamping. Similar but different graphics are in the making for the next round and I've started changing the user-info a bit. Going to make the details of how to nominate and rules and such clearer. With added rules concerning nominating nominees/winner from round 1 again.
For round 2 to go even more smoothly and be just as fun, we'd like to know what you think. Any problems, comments, suggestions, concrit, praise, etc lay it on us here.
The major question for this round was how much info from the nominations themselves to give out to nominees curious as to what they were nominated for. The only reason the info wasn't posted was simply that some people when nominating may feel they are doing so in confidence, if that makes sense! So next round we'll make it clear that what you say in nominations will be posted, as everyone is curious and rightly so and so others can see and maybe find new friends and sites of interest. I think maybe I was being overly conscious of not offending anyone. This community is more personal than others and I was being careful, probably too careful.
Nominator indentiy will still be secret unless the nominator wishes to reveal themselves.
We'd like suggestions for further categories. We can't promise to use them all, but we do promise to consider them all!
I'd like to know how many reference links you think each category requires. We went with 2 for most, except 'Contribution to the Fandom' in which we allowed 5 for round #1.
Was the nomination form clear enough, did it work ok, any problems?
Anything you'd like to see here? Did we do ok running the community? Anthing else you can think of? Suggestions of where to pimp and get as many people involved as possible?
Any questions you'd like to ask us?
And anyone fancy joining our team of panelists?
We have a great panel, but if we do create more categories we'll need more and we'd also like to be able to rotate who's judging so all the panelists have the chance to take a round or two off in order to be able to be nominated themselves!
I think that's all.... ^__^
Thank you for your time!
I'd like to take the opportunitly to thank everyone for taking part, Nebula of course, the panel, those who nominated..everyone! *squishes* The whole experience has been fun. And I've made some new friends in the process, which is always a bonus.
Firstly we do intend to do more rounds and from feedback I think maybe you'd like that too!
I'm already getting excited about round #2!
Next, lets cover what's already going to happen. I've started work on re-vamping. Similar but different graphics are in the making for the next round and I've started changing the user-info a bit. Going to make the details of how to nominate and rules and such clearer. With added rules concerning nominating nominees/winner from round 1 again.
For round 2 to go even more smoothly and be just as fun, we'd like to know what you think. Any problems, comments, suggestions, concrit, praise, etc lay it on us here.
The major question for this round was how much info from the nominations themselves to give out to nominees curious as to what they were nominated for. The only reason the info wasn't posted was simply that some people when nominating may feel they are doing so in confidence, if that makes sense! So next round we'll make it clear that what you say in nominations will be posted, as everyone is curious and rightly so and so others can see and maybe find new friends and sites of interest. I think maybe I was being overly conscious of not offending anyone. This community is more personal than others and I was being careful, probably too careful.
Nominator indentiy will still be secret unless the nominator wishes to reveal themselves.
We'd like suggestions for further categories. We can't promise to use them all, but we do promise to consider them all!
I'd like to know how many reference links you think each category requires. We went with 2 for most, except 'Contribution to the Fandom' in which we allowed 5 for round #1.
Was the nomination form clear enough, did it work ok, any problems?
Anything you'd like to see here? Did we do ok running the community? Anthing else you can think of? Suggestions of where to pimp and get as many people involved as possible?
Any questions you'd like to ask us?
And anyone fancy joining our team of panelists?
We have a great panel, but if we do create more categories we'll need more and we'd also like to be able to rotate who's judging so all the panelists have the chance to take a round or two off in order to be able to be nominated themselves!
I think that's all.... ^__^
Thank you for your time!