I've been noticing a pattern in my fandoms. I often have a favourite guilty pleasure character. You know, the sort of character that you shouldn't like, but absolutely do. For me it's usually a character who is established as the most annoying, amoral or despicable character on the show, yet I find them irresistable and brilliant. This is the part
(
Read more... )
I think thing with Pete and Gaius is that I liked them from the start. In S1 of Mad Men at least Pete was portrayed as the weasily villian of the show. I agree that since S1 other characters have been shown as more despicable where as Pete has actually grown up and become oddly admirable. Pete will always be Pete but now he's a more successful capable Pete (Also, I have to ask...what's your beef with Kinsey? I know he's a pretentious douche but I always found him one of the more harmless MM characters).
It's kind of the same with Gaius. He redeemed himself a little in S4 while other characters got worse, but they didn't really change the essence of his character, which was great. I guess I don't feel guilty for cheering these characters on. I'm just aware that I excuse a lot of henious behaviour from them, because I find them so awesome and entertaining.
Aww, now I wish I watched these shows you are talking about! Would you count Richard Alpert as one of your peripheral anti-hero types? He seems to fit the bill.
Reply
Alpert would fit the Krycek bill until S6 when they show removed his edge.
Your Misfits guy also looks like he could be Gaeta's brother!
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment