Thursday...

May 06, 2010 22:34



Good day at work: collecting computer serial numbers. At lunch, talked with Steph and gamergrrl about the Women's Show the way we would want it to be, and Apaplexy, and all manner of things.

The library is still closed "because of technical challenges related to a recent computer system upgrade." Hmmph.

I did my weights while watching The Sound of Music ( Read more... )

chatter, apaplexy

Leave a comment

monsieureden May 7 2010, 12:30:35 UTC
"The library is still closed "because of technical challenges related to a recent computer system upgrade." Hmmph."

Ha. That's never stopped us. ;)

This reminds me of This Book is Overdue! It is true, librarians have a love/hate relationship with the technology that so runs libraries now.

Reply

fajrdrako May 7 2010, 20:37:20 UTC
That's never stopped us. ;)

Looks like one step forward, two steps back - ! There was an article in the paper today about how the people who were supposed to be doing the upgrading in two days (and who took four) are in Utah and the city is handing them scads of money every year, and the head of the Library is furious. Maybe if the City cared more... [Sigh]

I often think that things ran more efficiently before everything was electronic. I'm not a Luddite, but sometimes computers really screw up processes that ought to be straightforward and simple.

Reply

monsieureden May 8 2010, 00:29:09 UTC
Yeah, systems / techies usually aren't in touch with librarians. We're typically very different brains. Though systems is becoming more a part of library school, which is good. Some of the mentality behind it will change w/ a younger generation. However, computers will never cease to be frustrating!! LOL.

Computers do screw things up; but I've only ever lived professionally with them, so I can't imagine pre-electronic libraries now! When the system is down at our library, there's basically nothing to do. We are THAT connected.

I am so thankful I never had to write out card catalog cards... omg (!!!!!)

Reply

fajrdrako May 11 2010, 14:15:59 UTC
What's wrong with card catalog[ue] cards... just that there'd be so many of them? Card catalogue cards are dear to my heart.

Come to think of it.. I could make and use them at home. What would I keep them in? Hmm. Things to muse upon.

Reply

monsieureden May 11 2010, 17:13:06 UTC
Writing out full, manual cataloging on cards was a real pain compared to linking it all electronically through OCLC (or a comparative system - i.e. copy cataloging). You still learn original cataloging, but it simply doesn't compare to having to make that many cards for so many items in a collection.

Never mind when people ripped out the see also cards and you had to rewrite them all appropriately.

I still love to hear older librarians complain about this: "When I was in school, we had to handwrite everything on cards!" Hell, I couldn't even do it with my penmanship. I'd have to decipher for everyone.

That said, we all have a soft spot for the card catalog. I used to use it. But I would never want to work with it again; it's safely in the library "museum." :)

Reply

fajrdrako May 12 2010, 00:25:32 UTC
The cards I remember were all typed on computers. And in university, it was all done on computers, but we still had cards, and drawers of card catalogues.

It was really fun finding the cards at the National Library in the British Museum.

Reply

monsieureden May 12 2010, 01:47:03 UTC
Yes, but librarians still learned how to write them in school. Doesn't seem to have been a fond memory for most.

Reply

fajrdrako May 12 2010, 12:06:13 UTC
I think I would have liked it; at least, I like it conceptually.

Reply

monsieureden May 12 2010, 01:49:58 UTC
This is fun: other obsolete librarian skills. lol. http://acrlog.org/2008/02/20/obsolete-academic-librarian-skills/

Reply

fajrdrako May 12 2010, 12:05:26 UTC
Obsolete skills for most people, I think!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up