I'm not quite sure but if you had seen the television ad for this same commerical it was of a family. Mother father and son, the mother of which was very overprotective. The child was drinking milk and the mother had to smell it to make sure it was okay etc. Certian things like that to show the mother was annoying and overprotective, showing that their internet service can be protective of her child too. This wasnt an act of "censorship of women" but rather the mother was being very overprotective *which was stressed through the whole commerical* and this made for a matter which people could take as funny not serious. If it was of a female child I'm sure the father/mother would have cut out the penis etc of the male anatomy in the book. It was just the way the commerical came about and was not pointntly gender specific. They couldn't have placed split screens of a male and female child becuase the comedy wouldn't have it's full effect. I'm certinaly up for womens rights, obviously, but I think that this wasn't ment to be analyzed and critisized. I do however understand that you would have to had seen the television ad to understand the full effect, thats where they did go wrong.
Reply
Leave a comment