Does that attitude thing actually work for you? I find the alinsky paradigm to be totally off putting if you have any kind of self-esteem at all, that just doesn't work.
The NR crew is a little too married to trying to prove they are intelligent, just like the Dem elitists. Neither side actually understands the working person or the heartland voter. But, at least, NR is amusing. We all need to laugh more. Look at the Iowa caucuses- TOTAL performance art- love it, wish the DNC could keep their mitts off of it, but that would be too much to ask. I think every state should come up with an election process as weird as Iowa- In NH you all could have pretend sword fights with enormous icicles. Whomsoever said, "a touch, I do confess it" would be required to support the candidate of the successful icy swordsman/woman. When you got it, there's no need to flaunt it- if you have any kind of self-esteem at all.
There were eleven states last time where the difference in the vote between Hillary and Trump was less than the third party and write in vote. 6 small states went for Hillary that way and 5 other states (some larger) went for Trump that way. It's gratifying that third parties and write-ins are gaining some power. Poor Hillary tried to blame EVERYONE- finally hit on a likeable female on the left who took away some of her votes (must be a russian agent!!). Talk about your conspiracy theorists.
My personal theory (haven't seen it published) is that guys who live with leftist females nod and say um-hum a lot and have to lie to the polls (mid-polls and exit/entrance polls) because the little woman is with them, but, when they get into the voting booth, they vote for TRUMP, because they've put up with SO MUCH FEMALE BLATHER just to keep peace in the apartment and a warm body next to them. Tee Hee.
And who are you supporting?
Trump is just someone who was able to win. The left and newbies who think they are elite actually built him the name recognition-even Billary contributed.
I used to enjoy Firing Line- the posturing, the eyes lighting up, the sly smile, and the words, of course. I enjoyed his many books of columns, including descriptions of a delightful sister or two. I read his novels, as well. About 8 or 9 , years ago. Recently found out that there were a few more and got them all, to re-read the old and enjoy the new.
I also enjoy some of Christopher Buckley's books- his better ones are, No Way To Treat a First Lady; Boomsday; Supreme Courtship and I Losing Mum and Pup was good. Of course, Thank You for Smoking was a movie based on one of his books- lots of changes in the movie but REALLY GOOD movie-FUNNY.
If you find yourself thinking or writing about politics and not laughing and smiling, you aren't doing it right. It's not about the candidate!!
And who are YOU supporting (with joy in your heart, I hope, otherwise, what's the point?)
Does that attitude thing actually work for you? I find the alinsky paradigm to be totally off putting if you have any kind of self-esteem at all, that just doesn't work.
The NR crew is a little too married to trying to prove they are intelligent, just like the Dem elitists. Neither side actually understands the working person or the heartland voter. But, at least, NR is amusing. We all need to laugh more.
Look at the Iowa caucuses- TOTAL performance art- love it, wish the DNC could keep their mitts off of it, but that would be too much to ask.
I think every state should come up with an election process as weird as Iowa- In NH you all could have pretend sword fights with enormous icicles. Whomsoever said, "a touch, I do confess it" would be required to support the candidate of the successful icy swordsman/woman.
When you got it, there's no need to flaunt it- if you have any kind of self-esteem at all.
There were eleven states last time where the difference in the vote between Hillary and Trump was less than the third party and write in vote. 6 small states went for Hillary that way and 5 other states (some larger) went for Trump that way. It's gratifying that third parties and write-ins are gaining some power. Poor Hillary tried to blame EVERYONE- finally hit on a likeable female on the left who took away some of her votes (must be a russian agent!!). Talk about your conspiracy theorists.
My personal theory (haven't seen it published) is that guys who live with leftist females nod and say um-hum a lot and have to lie to the polls (mid-polls and exit/entrance polls) because the little woman is with them, but, when they get into the voting booth, they vote for TRUMP, because they've put up with SO MUCH FEMALE BLATHER just to keep peace in the apartment and a warm body next to them.
Tee Hee.
And who are you supporting?
Trump is just someone who was able to win. The left and newbies who think they are elite actually built him the name recognition-even Billary contributed.
I used to enjoy Firing Line- the posturing, the eyes lighting up, the sly smile, and the words, of course. I enjoyed his many books of columns, including descriptions of a delightful sister or two.
I read his novels, as well. About 8 or 9 , years ago. Recently found out that there were a few more and got them all, to re-read the old and enjoy the new.
I also enjoy some of Christopher Buckley's books- his better ones are, No Way To Treat a First Lady; Boomsday; Supreme Courtship and I Losing Mum and Pup was good. Of course, Thank You for Smoking was a movie based on one of his books- lots of changes in the movie but REALLY GOOD movie-FUNNY.
If you find yourself thinking or writing about politics and not laughing and smiling, you aren't doing it right. It's not about the candidate!!
And who are YOU supporting (with joy in your heart, I hope, otherwise, what's the point?)
Reply
Leave a comment