Leave a comment

prototypic June 5 2009, 06:00:50 UTC
wow. i actually read the full thing.

your writing is amazing and although i don't read anything w/o teuk inside much this is just. asjdklad.

i feel like putting this in my memories.

...fuck that, i will.

Reply

fabriclies June 5 2009, 06:10:07 UTC
it helps that this is really short :D

ahjfsjg. i see your bias tharr. ♥ but that makes me feel special.

and even a memmm /tackles. umma is far too nice. people can't resist the married-ness

Reply

prototypic June 5 2009, 06:13:16 UTC
yeah. i was thinking that too. and of course, because the writing is amazing.

well you should. i always wish you'll write kangteuk but it's not your otp. oh well.

sseoni is way better. /glomps

Reply

fabriclies June 5 2009, 06:18:16 UTC
flatterer. i love you either way D<

the only reason i wrote them the other time was because this because... kanghyuk aujkfdsgj. XD never liked kangteuk till umma and appa came around

lies and you know it :3 /flees

Reply

prototypic June 5 2009, 06:24:06 UTC
lmfao no wonder. i never liked kanghyuk till you and appa came too. :/

don't know anything but the truth~

oh well. out of curiosity, have you written anything with sandcastles as a metaphor in it? i want to write but can't help thinking it's really familiar o_O

Reply

fabriclies June 5 2009, 06:27:33 UTC
there should be more kanghyuk shippers /spreads love

ushijkdghj. no words for you.

...no XD and you should totally right it because ideas are already popping up at the metaphor so it'd be lovely to see your take on it because your writing is iuhgajuhijkdbrilliant.

Reply

prototypic June 5 2009, 06:31:24 UTC
well actually the reason i like it because it's so angst-ridden. and teuk's normally the one with kangin

ahsdkasd because you know i'm not lying~

really? that's awesome. i don't know why, but whenever i write i seem to think it's really familiar and get deathly afraid you wrote something like it before. and my writing isn't brilliant.

Reply

fabriclies June 5 2009, 06:40:17 UTC
*writee. i should pay attention more.
---

because it's love with hyuk against kangteuk. ): it'ss always teuk or a girl that keeps them apart and it makes me DDD: and not of people write them so it's double DDD:. where was i going with this? /doesn't know.

auijkghjdhg no, because i used up all my stubbornness up already and you're ridiculous.

does that mean you're going to? :DD &&appa says that our styles are kind of alike (even though i don't see it because yours is brilliant and has this feel to it) so idk. but nope, no metaphoric writing with sandcastles from me. your writing and ideas are brilliant.

Reply

prototypic June 5 2009, 06:46:47 UTC
i thought it was cute :D
---

lmfao not many write kangteuk anymore too. DD:

ashdaskd i am not >:|

i was, but i paused for too long while trying to figure out if it was written before and now it's out and just looks like shit and nothing like what i though it'd be. and no mien isn't brilliant and has no feel except this choppy and disgusting feel to it. i could say the same for you. your writing and ideas are more than brilliant. they dazzle me.

Reply

fabriclies June 5 2009, 06:57:50 UTC
but you're biased. :DD ?
----

really? but they're so canon~~ i want to write them for you

are we going to start this again? 8D silly.

all the things i write don't turn out the way i thought in my head but that doesn't stop me from polluting LJ world. let me read? *-* dazzle? /does jazz hands. ♥ though that's not true either are you ever going to believe me, when i say that your writing is stunning?

Reply

prototypic June 5 2009, 07:01:19 UTC
weeeell. just a little. /eye twitches
---
yeah, but writers go for hanchul now because kangteuk is too mainstream. DOIT

pfft. i am not silly! >:|

no but i was going to write it but like i said, i paused for too long and i can't anymore. :/ and why did i type 'mien' up there? //fails and nope, because like i said, i only see the truth.

Reply

fabriclies June 5 2009, 06:18:53 UTC
'blueberry' is a color but not lemon? D:

Reply

prototypic June 5 2009, 06:24:29 UTC
lmfao dorkk.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up