ACORN Fraud Rumors Squashed

[exponential]

Originally published at Exponential. You can comment here or there.

(Ok, I couldn’t help it.  I like acorn squash.)

Let’s deal with the ACORN rumors, shall we?  I think anyone who has worked with a non-profit will feel pain at reading this, because it is so often that when you are trying to do the most good for a non-partisan cause that bad nuts get

Comments

[randy_68]

http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/stealing_the_presidency_an_oba.html... )

[exponential]

Pay no attention to the GOP behind the curtain. http://newmexicoindependent.com/6457/nm-gop-accused-of-voter-intimidation... )

[randy_68]

Thank you for proving the point I was making.

For every source saying it's clean, there is one questioning its cleanliness.

[exponential]

So, if there are equal numbers of sources questioning, that means it's real? One moment you're saying that the media is in the tank for Obama, and the next you're using the media's hype on sensationalist smears as a defense

[randy_68]

See my above point

[exponential]

Further reading at the American Thinker links has made me agree that caucuses are undemocratic.

But I guess I felt that way beforehand. No one said the system works well, or is fair. It is true that those who know how to work the system often get ahead.

I find it interesting, though, that NOW information from Hillary voters is coming out, as opposed to earlier in the year.

[randy_68]

No, the system doesn't work well. *shrug* But until someone comes up with a solution that all sides are willing to even consider...