this has been bugging me for awhile...

May 08, 2006 16:57

...why is it that most women's pants don't have back pockets?

xposted to
Read more... )

questions, pants, women

Leave a comment

Comments 10

boundmuse May 9 2006, 00:10:47 UTC
Because 1) We don't carry wallets, so what would we need a back pocket for and 2) We don't want our butts to be any bigger than necessary. ;)

Reply

astro_american May 9 2006, 00:49:23 UTC
No more junk in the trunk?

Reply

evilgrins May 9 2006, 02:20:27 UTC
since when don't you carry wallets; women as a whole, not necessarily just you

Reply

boundmuse May 9 2006, 03:37:45 UTC
If we do carry them, we put them in our purse.

Reply


tigerfaerie May 9 2006, 00:40:02 UTC
I hate pants without pockets. I do carry things in my back pocket (notably my work keys, so that they jingle when I walk and I don't forget to put them back).

Though! I would rather not have pockets than to have the teeny, tiny ones they do put on women's pants. That I think looks worse. Because then you have all this ass and this tiny pocket. Who thinks that makes your butt look smaller?

Reply


ronin_lethe May 9 2006, 01:07:27 UTC
because GOD MOCKS ME!!!!

actually, i don't own a single pair of pants without back pockets. but mebbe that's me.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

evilgrins May 9 2006, 02:27:08 UTC
oh, I dunno. if I saw a small circle (possibly a condom impression) that might make for a smile

Reply


findingmeg May 9 2006, 02:39:56 UTC
Mine do. I know because for some strange reason, I tend to stand with one hand in a back pocket. Maybe I just like grabbing my own ass. Durrr.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up