Comments | evil_sarah: Good 'ole Watson

evil_sarah

Good 'ole Watson

Mar 16, 2004 19:15

Psychology was interesting today. We learned more about this researcher named J. B. Watson. He had sex with his assistant instead of his wife to study sex and torchered a small child to study conditioned responses. It was kinda like the Pavlov experiment only Watson took an infant and showed it several soft, furry objects (bunnies, cotton balls ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Back to all threads

nastyelfbread March 17 2004, 11:50:10 UTC

Being so obsessed with hamsters is a disturbing thing...

Did you know that Richard Gere stuck a hamster up his anus?

That was a gerbil, my bad. ^_^

What? evil_sarah March 17 2004, 12:54:04 UTC

Why the hell did he do that?

Re: What? nastyelfbread March 17 2004, 12:58:28 UTC

FOR 'pleasure'. Why else?

Re: What? evil_sarah March 17 2004, 13:05:33 UTC

Wow....that's really gross...

(The comment has been removed)

Re: What? nastyelfbread March 17 2004, 13:10:32 UTC

I know, that's why I said you're a pervy. Pervy.

Re: What? evil_sarah March 17 2004, 13:20:34 UTC

Who's the bigger perve? Me who just happens to think small rodents are cute, you who knows how to use a small rodent for...pleasure, or Jakey with his Japanese Schoolgirls?

Re: What? nastyelfbread March 17 2004, 13:27:36 UTC

I don't know how to use it. I wouldn't ever, either. I said Richard GERE did it and knows how. But I heard he used a toilet paper roll tube to get it in. Bwahaha. Small rodents aren't cute, they're evil and unable to be tamed. Evil, evil. I think Jakey's school girls are prefectly normal... as opposed to your hamster obsession.

Re: What? evil_sarah March 17 2004, 13:43:10 UTC

See? You do know how he did it! :P

My love of hamsters is FAR from an obsession. Now my love of Zelda....

The school girls thing is still gross.

Re: What? jakey_mcjake March 17 2004, 16:12:51 UTC

They're all of legal age, jackass. That's twice you've insulted me when I didn't warrant it. Fucker.

Re: What? evil_sarah March 17 2004, 16:15:09 UTC

I never said they were underage! 8-|

Re: What? evil_sarah March 17 2004, 16:55:30 UTC

In fact, I was assuming they were of legal age. >_

Re: What? evil_sarah March 17 2004, 17:08:20 UTC

Because you and I both know that child pornography is beyond sick unlike the everyday, run-of-the-mill perviness of, oh I don't know, EVERYONE!

Re: What? nastyelfbread March 17 2004, 21:36:36 UTC

I read it in a forward. Sue me.

And stop being so presumptuous, Norm.

And now you're accusing 'everyone' of being pervy. Why don't you just stop while you're ahead, eh?

And you'd think a Mormon would know when to quit...

Back to all threads

Leave a comment