Did you know we didn't know what the clitoris looked like until 2009?" ...why am I not surprised? I was shocked when
cornerofmadness told me that there had been no studies of women's heart attack symptoms - which differ from men's - until semi-recently (the past fifteen years, CoM? I can't remember).
But no, we're not second class citizens. Nope.
Comments 25
But then I'm a hysterical feminazi, so go fig.
Reply
I was literally so shocked, all I could say was, "Well, we'll have to agree to disagree on this one."
My friend x_expat was much better at explaining why the provision was a GOOD thing, and I followed it up with, "...and I'm on BC because of my health - as are a numerous amount of my celibate friends". Niece never answered, sadly.
Reply
I got into a debate with a friend's father about this because he was arguing that BC coverage would lead to more abortions. To which my only possible answer was "You don't give a shit about life, asshole, you just care about controlling what women do."
Reply
Since I've had cancer twice in the past (minor, very minor, but still), I want my mammograms - especially since my breast type is prone to cancer. :\
Reply
Reply
Reply
Downright sickening.
Reply
Reply
also this article doesn't stand up to fact checking. there were studies of 3-D structure dating back at least 3 years prior done by men in London and that's because the technology didn't exist until then.
that said women are poorly studied for things that are not directly related to reproduction
eta - it was cardio you're thinking of and a study just came out showing that red wine DOES in fact help women (they thought it wouldn't) and helps to lose weight (one small glass, too bad it's red...)
Reply
Disappointed about fact checking - that would've been nice.
Reply
but it is very recent. then again so is the limbic system research
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment