Leave a comment

(The comment has been removed)

et_cave_canem December 14 2007, 19:48:53 UTC
Procedure » system load: unregistered references set » empirical set » source ‘Mao’

Source: ‘Mao’
Species: feline
Physical characteristics: loading
Observation: overweight
Trivia: prone to emotional displays → sarcasm

Hypothesis: the input of 'Mao' has sarcastic connotations.
Hypothesis probability: 88.52%

Procedure: assume hypothesis.

'Mao' disapproves.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

et_cave_canem December 14 2007, 19:52:01 UTC
'Mao' exhibits a moderate logical capacity.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

et_cave_canem December 14 2007, 19:58:11 UTC
Input: 'Mao' synthesizes 50% of the given analysis.

Hypothesis: 'Mao' possesses a superior logical capacity.
Hypothesis probability: 29%

Procedure: refuse hypothesis.

Negative, 'Mao.'

[ooc: Mao. ;.; ]

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

et_cave_canem December 14 2007, 20:12:56 UTC
Your premise presupposes that 'Contractors'
are intellectually different from 'humans.'

Assumption unverified.

Logical capacity still moderate, 'Mao.'

[ooc: Tres does it all so obliviously. Like... "it's ok to be limited, Mao, it's all part of your CPU.' ._.]

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

et_cave_canem December 14 2007, 20:46:18 UTC
Reiteration: you have not proven that 'Contractors' differ from 'humans.'

Analysis pending, 'Mao.'

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

et_cave_canem December 14 2007, 20:52:34 UTC
Moderate logical capacity assigned to Mao, then.

[ooc: ALL IS WELL. See? Tres STILL A BASTARD.]

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

et_cave_canem December 14 2007, 21:05:33 UTC
Acknowledged, 'Mao.'

Damage report?

[ooc: but at least feel proud, Mao. ;.; you've entered the 'regulars' category - he'll ask for damage reports!]

Reply


Leave a comment

Up