Conservatorship abuse - 3
As I mentioned before "conservatorship abuse" is a very profound - a perfect crime, because the closest relatives, who have access to the private situation, are financially interested, and because the conservatee is always persuaded to go under conservatorship as an act of promoting their best interests.
Therefore, although the conservatorship abuse is technically possible as an individual incident, when a legal conservator mistreats his conservatee, and after which the conservatee has right to stop the conservatorship or to change the conservator, but it is not possible to stay permanent (conservatorship abuse) without free will of conservatee and without his voluntary will to keep silent.
Conservatorship against the will in the case, when a person is able and willing to take care of themselves - "to meet their basic needs of food, clothing, and shelter", is technically not possible. The people, who are grown up, and who are classified by a medical report as cognitively fit for living in the free world - are people, who legally categorized as a fully responsible adults. And in some situations here can hide the major problem - free will of an adult person to do whatever they want and to take a full personal responsibility for their actions.
If you sum up a probable fear of a person to be exposed to the risks of a free big world while being fully responsible for own actions and high interest of the closest ones in controlling person's life and finances, you can easily come to the conclusion that conservatorship is a very convenient and maybe even only model for the lifestyle, which will satisfy all the parties.
So, the problem of a permanent "conservatorship abuse" can only arise, when a conservatee is permanent being persuaded by a conservator to remain under conservatorship while the conservatee doesn't feel anymore that being under conservatorship is the best way to fulfil their individual personality.
And that was exactly the case of Britney Spears.
To be continued...