some would call it insight or words of wisdom
Passionate till the very last drop of soulful convictions. Can the mistake happen once again? Whereas impatience leant its hinderance to the vulnerable longing of a quiet spark, throughout space it consumes every last bit of preferences, though it disperses into an array of grievances. How then can the mind ask for, or desire what it may not have, but the instant it does grab-a-hold, it clenches with all its might, but loses the unwinnable fight? Is it correct in its manner of selfishness, for it may never have a chance, or shun its deepest emotions to let what is to happen, occur? May it be the truth that it does not deserve that last bit of ecstacy that should be promised to it, or friendly essence to accompany it? As it does not hold beauty much more then anything but as a inner chamber that is full of pleasant frangrance? How can the good be let down, while the major vicious characters win it all? May we ever know the answer to why the great let down is nothing but a minor moment in time, but is a great abomination to the righteous spirit? Lay down the plea, lay down the wish, for the water that gush upon the head of the willing can only clean the tears upon the spirit, but leaves behind a stain for all to remember.
Selfish slingshots of glowing adoration for all who smile. Jealousy strides from the need for a closing void, a sunshine on the withering spirit. But woe is the one who spreads vile inquisitions to the smiling folk. The need for hate could not restrict ones mind, for it is worthless bother for all to see. Dare not to the obsessive-compulsive, for they shall never reign as the light of the world. Their existence is a glare to the eyes of loving hearts, abominations darker then shadows. For those who live by the way of the lashing tongue, your time is up, your words are worth nothing.
So you ask yourself, where does the world form around us and how would we fit into the mold of being part of the world without conforming to it? So to say our performance might be a lie but we might think of it as truth because our performance is all we know, until we dig deeper into a mindset to have the understanding of our own existence. Surely this would not make any sense, but as your probe into the inter-connectiveness of our lives and our world, then it wouldn't matter if we're different because we're also the same. But in psychology it explains to us that everyone is the same but different. Where we all live in this world as people, but we have different patterns of thought that establishes our differences to each other. But where would this quality matter in our everyday lives? What would all of this extensive thought conclude and seem to prove? What is the correct way to be part of the world without conforming to it, and instead of a performance we should be ourselves? How is being different and similar significant to living on the gray level?
Swaying from one idea to the other, opinions fly about like untamed birds, but the untamed birds also have a rule of conduct. The liberal opinions are bashing into each other. Does that mean our opinions are of lesser quality then birds?
As we are part of this world, we're somehow connected to each other, but instead of thinking everything is glossed over with goodwill, human drama takes us back to the path where distinguishing the how-to to living without conformity would exist.
Reality - our brief existence in this realm of understanding. The very definition of reality however, is very different from varying perspectives. To be rigid and fixed in thinking, we can define it as the cause and effect cycle of actions based on our own direct stimuli. For the same, it is restricted to the actions that we do directly. However, it is a mystery of sorts for me. It becomes very limited in today’s world where a majority of our life is spent in what is collectively known as “Virtual Reality”
The addiction or necessity of this pseudo-world remains a much discussed subject. I attempt to add my own PoV in the mix. This is especially true for computer gaming. Are the games we play only a tiny part of our imagination or do they warrant the same amount of respect as any other form of entertainment? Whatever be your answer, I have an argument. If indeed games are just a part of your imagination, don’t they form a part of your collective mental experience? And if so, what makes YOU distinguish them from reality or virtual reality? It’s easy to say what is real or virtual from a bystander’s field of vision. However, when you are the person making these judgments, what are the criteria for discrimination?
Experiences are defined by you alone. They leave you with a plethora of emotion and logic. This stands true for both real and virtual experiences. So the next time you decide to call another person a geek or the like just because of his “Virtual” thingamajig, think again.
Selfish slingshots of glowing adoration for all who smile. Jealousy strides from the need for a closing void, a sunshine on the withering spirit. But woe is the one who spreads vile inquisitions to the smiling folk. The need for hate could not restrict ones mind, for it is worthless bother for all to see. Dare not to the obsessive-compulsive, for they shall never reign as the light of the world. Their existence is a glare to the eyes of loving hearts, abominations darker then shadows. For those who live by the way of the lashing tongue, your time is up, your words are worth nothing.
So you ask yourself, where does the world form around us and how would we fit into the mold of being part of the world without conforming to it? So to say our performance might be a lie but we might think of it as truth because our performance is all we know, until we dig deeper into a mindset to have the understanding of our own existence. Surely this would not make any sense, but as your probe into the inter-connectiveness of our lives and our world, then it wouldn't matter if we're different because we're also the same. But in psychology it explains to us that everyone is the same but different. Where we all live in this world as people, but we have different patterns of thought that establishes our differences to each other. But where would this quality matter in our everyday lives? What would all of this extensive thought conclude and seem to prove? What is the correct way to be part of the world without conforming to it, and instead of a performance we should be ourselves? How is being different and similar significant to living on the gray level?
Swaying from one idea to the other, opinions fly about like untamed birds, but the untamed birds also have a rule of conduct. The liberal opinions are bashing into each other. Does that mean our opinions are of lesser quality then birds?
As we are part of this world, we're somehow connected to each other, but instead of thinking everything is glossed over with goodwill, human drama takes us back to the path where distinguishing the how-to to living without conformity would exist.
Reality - our brief existence in this realm of understanding. The very definition of reality however, is very different from varying perspectives. To be rigid and fixed in thinking, we can define it as the cause and effect cycle of actions based on our own direct stimuli. For the same, it is restricted to the actions that we do directly. However, it is a mystery of sorts for me. It becomes very limited in today’s world where a majority of our life is spent in what is collectively known as “Virtual Reality”
The addiction or necessity of this pseudo-world remains a much discussed subject. I attempt to add my own PoV in the mix. This is especially true for computer gaming. Are the games we play only a tiny part of our imagination or do they warrant the same amount of respect as any other form of entertainment? Whatever be your answer, I have an argument. If indeed games are just a part of your imagination, don’t they form a part of your collective mental experience? And if so, what makes YOU distinguish them from reality or virtual reality? It’s easy to say what is real or virtual from a bystander’s field of vision. However, when you are the person making these judgments, what are the criteria for discrimination?
Experiences are defined by you alone. They leave you with a plethora of emotion and logic. This stands true for both real and virtual experiences. So the next time you decide to call another person a geek or the like just because of his “Virtual” thingamajig, think again.