Leave a comment

verrucaria July 25 2007, 15:05:55 UTC
I'm surprised that Fanny's only complaining about the speach/behavior of the female characters. The male characters were also being... ummm... immodest.

I know that Austen's big thing was that she never wrote scenes in which no women were present because she didn't know she didn't know how men might behave when not in the presence of ladies. Even so, Fanny's apparent lack of interest in the comportment of the men in this ultra-vapid play amuses me.

Reply

verrucaria July 25 2007, 15:07:40 UTC
speech, damn it!

And excuse my terrible lack of editing. I need some caffeine...

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

verrucaria July 25 2007, 17:40:46 UTC
They were indeed. I'd still expect a "lady" to become "aghast" by "untoward" speech from men...

Reply

sekl July 25 2007, 16:41:47 UTC
Maybe she felt that Mr. Yates wasn't making that much of a character stretch, besides playing a guy with money. ;)

Henry as a loving son isn't a bad character stretch, but a stretch.

And Edmund being ridiculed for being a clergyman by a flirt...yep definitely in character.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up