Oh. My. God. How the econopocalypse happened

Nov 26, 2008 12:33

Porfolio.com has a long article that explains, in excruiating, on-the-ground detail, how the econopocalypse came upon us: The End of Wall Street's BoomIf you read nothing else about the stock market, read this. It helps to make sense of it all. It helps to understand how the movement of money through Wall Street, with each layer taking its cut, ( Read more... )

shrill

Leave a comment

Comments 5

(The comment has been removed)

(The comment has been removed)

en_ki December 1 2008, 17:08:03 UTC
The pyramid had a bunch of suckers at the bottom. The bailout turns those people from suckers into happy crooks and makes the rest of us into the last layer of suckers.

The fewer layers there are, the fewer victims there are and the fewer happy crooks.

The right outcome for this is that those of us who stayed out, and therefore aren't under water on our mortgages or failing to make our margin calls, can buy real estate at reasonable prices and clean up by picking the good securities out of the fire sale. The bailout is serving to prevent that.

Reply


Yeah, that's why the patient died. ideaphile November 27 2008, 04:13:42 UTC
Unfortunately, this piece doesn't explain why the patient got sick in the first place. That makes it pretty much impossible to prevent the disease next time.

. png

Reply

Re: Yeah, that's why the patient died. ideaphile November 29 2008, 03:58:02 UTC
uhm.... don't do that ?

Reply

Re: Yeah, that's why the patient died. ideaphile November 29 2008, 04:23:22 UTC
Don't do what? Don't let people be greedy and stupid? Good luck with that.

. png

Reply


ewhac November 27 2008, 08:45:17 UTC
This piece has been going around, and it's an excellent piece. But everyone highlights this one paragraph. Even after reading it for the fourth time, I still don't get it. Is he talking about a genuinely non-existent loan, fraudulently created to sell a CDS against? Or is he using the concept of a loan as a rhetorical stand-in for another CDS, in an attempt to describe swaps insuring swaps insuring swaps? He flips between heavily overloaded terminology too quickly...

Reply


Leave a comment

Up