Setting the record straight on ejaculate

Jan 14, 2012 21:45

So, apparently there's this meme going around that a single ejaculation containes something like 1.5 terabytes of data. However, after de-duplication and BWT-based compression, you'd only end up with something like 15KB of Shannon information ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

solarbird January 15 2012, 06:09:13 UTC
Which on a 1500 baud Kansas City interface cassette system would be a nice round 16 feet(!) (192 inches) of audiotape - ignoring leader and header information, of course, since that varies by cassette and system.

I'e never seen a man produce that length of ejaculate - it's always been quite a bit more compact than that - so I'd have to say that it's considerably more space-efficient than cassette.

But quite a bit messier, and even less durable.

Reply

amindofiron January 15 2012, 09:43:12 UTC
and now I have a mental image of some sort of bizarre robo-jaculate composed of a unwinding spool of magnetic tape. why do I read this stuff when I know by brain is gonna do things like *that* with it?

Reply

drhoz January 15 2012, 10:16:40 UTC
XD

Reply

solarbird January 15 2012, 17:43:32 UTC
Be glad I didn't do the math for paper tape. There's nothing more annoying than an ejaculate cut.

Reply

amindofiron January 15 2012, 22:23:02 UTC
ow....ow ow ow OW! *shudder*, I'm going away now.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up