In Advanced Literature we've been analyzing fairy tales. More specifically we're talking about how the author of a tale frames the text to produce a moral they agree with. This week's subject is Cinderella
( Read more... )
Why? That's what they're there for. You can disagree with the text but not the method of transmission. This is how we socialize children into obediant adults. Don't you remember them from childhood?
Purity's only part of it. It's one of the feminine virtues implied but not the whole of them. There are related ones (modesty, chastity) but also there are others (obedience, sweetness, mildness, all the characteristics of a calf about to be slaughtered)....All of these are implied. The foot is normally hidden, just like people's true natures. In exposing it, the Prince exposed the wicked stepmother and her daughters as false women: masculine in their cunning (according to the rules of fairy tales at least) and as cunning women, they recieved punishment, becoming blind beggars the rest of their lives.
But I wonder if there's such a thing as a different kind of Prince...
["Look. I think she's trying to imply abuse
( ... )
[He's not as good at 'hearing' between lines of text, not enough sensory data to catalog and understand, but her turns of phrase make him pause uncertainly.]
There's no such thing as a 'Prince' at all. Just people. Just you.
Reply
Reply
I don't. It's. No good taking morals from stories.
Reply
Reply
"I wouldn't be where I am now if I followed that advice."
Reply
Reply
It's fine. ...More importantly, it's kind of weird to judge people by their feet anyway. It's a metaphor about 'purity' built on superficiality.
Reply
But I wonder if there's such a thing as a different kind of Prince...
["Look. I think she's trying to imply abuse ( ... )
Reply
There's no such thing as a 'Prince' at all. Just people. Just you.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Poor judge of character?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment