Mar 31, 2010 21:13
[audio // English]
When someone gives you a name, it doesn't necessarily follow they were telling the truth about it being their name, especially if they have reason to lie.
The principle can be generalized to a variety of conversational circumstances.
[Kusanagi's gone clear past exasperation and into resignation.]
surrounded by idiots,
"gullible" is too kind,
the major explains it all
Leave a comment
Reply
[Kusanagi leads a very untrusting life.]
Reply
Have you had many who offered you a false identity, Major?
Reply
Oh Phoenix, you're so cute when you're stupid.]
Reply
I take that as a yes.
[Not that that's surprising, either. Working with pirates for the past five years, Phoenix is well aware how quickly some people resort to lies.
But he wants to know more about the Major and what sort of life she's led.]
So how do you respond when you do realize that someone has lied about who they are?
Reply
Reply
In another case is a comrade in arms, a man who has fought reliably on your side. As it turns out, though, he has committed atrocities in the past that many would consider unforgivable. His crimes were never punished, though, and there's no way to know if he has truly changed.
How would you deal with these two men?
Reply
There's a complicated probabilistic risk model involved that's modified by other variables in the situation, and my staff will provide a reliability assessment.
At any rate, any source of intelligence must be evaluated in the context of other sources.
[Why yes, information warfare is a science where she comes from.]
That said, I'd brain-hack him.
[The Major is not a woman who loses sleep over casual violations of civil rights.]
As to the second...so?
[Oh, Phoenix, she doesn't give a shit about "atrocities." You're so cute.
PS. Have you met Batou?]
Reply
But as to the matter at hand... Phoenix's estimation of the Major increases a notch at her answer. She's very thorough - impressively so - even with a situation that is only hypothetical, and she doesn't take things at face value. Hmm. It would be interesting to see her in a situation that's real.]
I don't believe I am familiar with that term. What does "brain-hack" mean?
And do you not care that a man you are working with was a criminal in the past?
Reply
[It's utterly terrifying, almost uniformly illegal, and Kusanagi is among the best in the world at it.]
Laws are arbitrary. A criminal can cross a border and become a hero. If you mean to ask me about morality, say so.
Reply
Are you assuming the individual is mechanical in nature?
[Instances of organic-cybernetic combinations are rare in Phoenix's world, and he isn't aware of the few instances where anything like the cyberbrain technology of Kusanagi's world was achieved with any success - if you can consider Vin or Cyber Errol's fates a success.
He shakes his head.]
The word atrocity implies a moral deviation, but very well, if I must be clearer, then yes, I am speaking of morality here.
Reply
[It's not her fault the Jak world is a "primitive shithole," to quote the Mechanic.]
The only moral dimension I'm concerned with in my subordinates is whether they follow my orders.
[If they were a baby-killer before they joined up, they'll damn well stop, because she said so, and you do not fuck with the Major.]
Reply
[That seems to be what she's implying, but he wants to be sure he understands.
He pauses for a moment as he weighs that last statement.]
So the question then is what moral lines you draw.
[It isn't exactly a question, but it is an invitation, and he'll be listening carefully to whatever response she gives.]
Reply
[So which question is she answering?]
Reply
You have no qualms about doing something like that? Is... cyberbrain hacking considered acceptable in your world?
Reply
["I have no qualms whatsoever~"]
Reply
Leave a comment