List of Russian nationals named in the CAATSA unclassified report The list of "oligarchs" and businessmen submitted as part of one of the five reports delivered to Congress on 29 January 2018 included 96 names.[84][54][60]
Although it was widely, and incorrectly, reported in the media that those on the list "may be subject to sanctions",[85] the CAATSA Report itself made clear that it "in no way should be interpreted to impose sanctions on those individuals or entities". It also specified that inclusion in the report "does not constitute the determination by any agency that any of those individuals or entities meet the criteria for designation under any sanctions program", and in no way indicates that "the U.S. Government has information about the individual's involvement in malign activities".[61]
То есть вроде как доказывать надо таки конкретно и индивидуально, а список это как руководство к действию типа как: присмотритесь к этим людям.
552. Has the Treasury Department now sanctioned the individuals and entities included in its January 29, 2018 report on senior political figures, oligarchs, and parastatal entities of the Russian Federation? Answer No. Pursuant to section 241 of Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act of 2017 (Pub. L. 115-44), the Treasury Department, in consultation with Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, delivered a report on January 29, 2018 to the specified congressional committees regarding significant senior political figures and oligarchs in the Russian Federation and Russian parastatal entities.
This report is not a “sanctions list.”While some persons mentioned in the report may have been sanctioned pursuant to other authorities, the inclusion of individuals or entities in this report, its appendices, or its classified annex does not and in no way should be interpreted to impose sanctions on those individuals or entities.Inclusion in this report also does not constitute a determination by any agency that any of those individuals or entities meet the criteria for designation under any sanctions program.Moreover, the inclusion of individuals or entities in this report, its appendices, or its classified annex does not, in and of itself, imply, give rise to, or create any restrictions, prohibitions, or limitations on dealings with such persons by either U.S. or foreign persons.Neither does inclusion in the unclassified report indicate that the U.S. Government has information about the individual’s involvement in malign activities.
Так там же вроде написано что нет никакого исполнения по списку и даже что Neither does inclusion in the unclassified report indicate that the U.S. Government has information about the individual’s involvement in malign activities. То есть, что они вообще в чем то виноваты(потому как в развитой судебной системе обвинять кого-то абстрактно и общо это верный путь что в суде адвокаты противоположной стороны тебя раскатают в блин).
За 4 года ситуация могла и измениться, особенно в последний месяц, но у меня есть подозрение что люди которые понимают что происходит в юридическом поле, сейчас получают огромные почасовые гонорары.
Со стороны общим взглядом ощущение: чиновникам отсудить обратно будет сложновато, но вот людям, не имеющих официальных постов вполне, хотя и не сразу. Потому как иначе слишком сильный прецедент на всех уровнях образуется.
В википедии написано, что
List of Russian nationals named in the CAATSA unclassified report
The list of "oligarchs" and businessmen submitted as part of one of the five reports delivered to Congress on 29 January 2018 included 96 names.[84][54][60]
Although it was widely, and incorrectly, reported in the media that those on the list "may be subject to sanctions",[85] the CAATSA Report itself made clear that it "in no way should be interpreted to impose sanctions on those individuals or entities". It also specified that inclusion in the report "does not constitute the determination by any agency that any of those individuals or entities meet the criteria for designation under any sanctions program", and in no way indicates that "the U.S. Government has information about the individual's involvement in malign activities".[61]
То есть вроде как доказывать надо таки конкретно и индивидуально, а список это как руководство к действию типа как: присмотритесь к этим людям.
Reply
https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-sanctions/faqs/552
552. Has the Treasury Department now sanctioned the individuals and entities included in its January 29, 2018 report on senior political figures, oligarchs, and parastatal entities of the Russian Federation?
Answer
No. Pursuant to section 241 of Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act of 2017 (Pub. L. 115-44), the Treasury Department, in consultation with Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, delivered a report on January 29, 2018 to the specified congressional committees regarding significant senior political figures and oligarchs in the Russian Federation and Russian parastatal entities.
This report is not a “sanctions list.”While some persons mentioned in the report may have been sanctioned pursuant to other authorities, the inclusion of individuals or entities in this report, its appendices, or its classified annex does not and in no way should be interpreted to impose sanctions on those individuals or entities.Inclusion in this report also does not constitute a determination by any agency that any of those individuals or entities meet the criteria for designation under any sanctions program.Moreover, the inclusion of individuals or entities in this report, its appendices, or its classified annex does not, in and of itself, imply, give rise to, or create any restrictions, prohibitions, or limitations on dealings with such persons by either U.S. or foreign persons.Neither does inclusion in the unclassified report indicate that the U.S. Government has information about the individual’s involvement in malign activities.
Date Released
January 30, 2018
Reply
Или просто выяснилось что-то новое про конкретных олигархов, и они стали подпадать под этот закон?
Или всё было известно уже в 2018-м, но исполнение почему-то откладывали?
Reply
За 4 года ситуация могла и измениться, особенно в последний месяц, но у меня есть подозрение что люди которые понимают что происходит в юридическом поле, сейчас получают огромные почасовые гонорары.
Со стороны общим взглядом ощущение: чиновникам отсудить обратно будет сложновато, но вот людям, не имеющих официальных постов вполне, хотя и не сразу. Потому как иначе слишком сильный прецедент на всех уровнях образуется.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment