People, Wikipedia is only your friend if....
you actually understand the basic concepts of your fancy words! You can't do a google search and spout shit out your ass without it being fairly apparent you have no clue what you are saying.
When I state let me explain this in incredibly simple terms I mean-let me explain this in incredibly simple terms.
So when people are confused by the words statistically insignificant please understand they are not going to understand the definition of epistasis! And if you understood truly what epistasis meant, you would understand I explained it in laymans terms. Oh-and just for shits and giggles-your wikipedia knowledge even references to mutations, which is more commonly understood. Is it too simple? Yeah, but we aren't talking to individuals who are advanced in their study of genetics (and I'm not either-so don't misinterpret me.)
And yes, if you understood the punnet square (basic biology) then you would see my example includes use of the punnet square-however, your point is still ridiculous, because the punnet square is only going to reaffirm my first point-if you use your punnet square all day long you will never see a Bb or BB arise from individuals who contribute bb and bb. Never. Do it all day long, it won't change. Why? Because the punnet square in this simple diagram will *not* account for mutations!
Reading comphrension is your friend-get you some.
When I state let me explain this in incredibly simple terms I mean-let me explain this in incredibly simple terms.
So when people are confused by the words statistically insignificant please understand they are not going to understand the definition of epistasis! And if you understood truly what epistasis meant, you would understand I explained it in laymans terms. Oh-and just for shits and giggles-your wikipedia knowledge even references to mutations, which is more commonly understood. Is it too simple? Yeah, but we aren't talking to individuals who are advanced in their study of genetics (and I'm not either-so don't misinterpret me.)
And yes, if you understood the punnet square (basic biology) then you would see my example includes use of the punnet square-however, your point is still ridiculous, because the punnet square is only going to reaffirm my first point-if you use your punnet square all day long you will never see a Bb or BB arise from individuals who contribute bb and bb. Never. Do it all day long, it won't change. Why? Because the punnet square in this simple diagram will *not* account for mutations!
Reading comphrension is your friend-get you some.