Hurr Hurr BOOBIES!
Since my baby girl was born six months ago, I've been a pretty strong breastfeeding advocate. There are dozens of reasons why "breast is best," and yet still in America so many people perceive it as indecent and, some dare to say, gross. I just don't get it. We are the most back-asswards country in the entire world!
Lately I've been following the continued "controversy" over a Spanish baby doll that will be arriving on store shelves in the U.S. some time in the future. Maybe you've heard of it too?
Reactions on The Breast Milk Baby have been ridiculously exaggerated, but I think none take the cake quite as much as the Fox News Network.
All right. I don't know who this bitch is, but I really want to punch her in the face a billion times for her stupidity. She says in the above video, and I quote, "Breasts serve three purposes. They entice a man to sleep with you. They feed the babies that result from that. And then they just prove Newton's law of gravity."
WHAT?
That last one isn't even a purpose.
And then . . . LOOK AT WHAT SHE'S WEARING!!!
It's perfectly okay for her to dress provocatively on national television, but it's indecent for a woman to nurse her baby in public? She doesn't say that in the above segment, but it's a concept I've heard more than I care to. Women get ridiculed and berated on a daily basis, told to leave stores because "hey, lady! You can't do that in here! It's indecent!" What? Like HELL you say!
Her comment isn't even, I don't think, the most absurd one in the entire segment. The shmuck in the dress shirt at the end of the video comments that seeing a woman breastfeeding her three-year-old son at dinner "was like watching dwarf porn."
Double WHAT?
Wow. Just wow.
I honestly don't know what all the outrage is about. I, personally, think it's about goddamn time that the market encourages breastfeeding. They've got that ridiculous Baby Alive doll that eats and pees and poops. I also discovered that there's a baby doll named Baby Wee Wee who, if you ask me, is more disturbing than a baby doll that pretends to suckle at a pretend teat.
Hey, Stupid Bitch on Fox News! The penis has more than one function too! Should we be allowing our daughters to play with baby dolls with anatomically correct body parts that do as nature intended them to do?
Granted, I'm not sure if that doll is still on the market anymore, but hey.
One more video to share.
I ♥ Sara Gilbert, as I posted on facebook. But Leah Remini? I want to punch her in the face SO HARD too. The gagging? Really?
What I really don't get is how in America today women go out of their way to be "strong" feminists. Women are outraged when a man treats them like a sexual object, and yet take all that extra time and effort to make themselves appear sexually attractive. Botox. Breast implants. Tight, provocative clothing that shows as much cleavage as possible without exposing the nipple. Push-up bras. Skinny jeans. Cosmetics. Hair dye. Tons and tons of beauty products on the market. Emphasis after emphasis on breasts being a "sexual organ."
I don't even understand how the breasts are considered a sexual organ at all. They serve no actual purpose in the art of procreation. The eggs aren't stored in the mammary glands. Biologically, they provide no function until after a baby is born. Why are they so sexualized in our society? Why do people gasp in shock and awe, turn away in disgust and disapproval, whenever they see a women using her breasts as nature intended? TO FEED HER BABY!
Personally, I'd much prefer it if our future's children are brought up in a society where women are not viewed as sexual objects quite as strongly as they are now. I'd love it if men looked at a woman not because she has "HURR HURR BOOBIES" but with respect and appreciation for the female form.
God or Mother Nature, or whatever your belief in the origin of the human species may be, made breasts on females to lactate, to feed our offspring. Not to be ogled and fondled for man's (or woman's) pleasure.
Lately I've been following the continued "controversy" over a Spanish baby doll that will be arriving on store shelves in the U.S. some time in the future. Maybe you've heard of it too?
Click to viewReactions on The Breast Milk Baby have been ridiculously exaggerated, but I think none take the cake quite as much as the Fox News Network.
All right. I don't know who this bitch is, but I really want to punch her in the face a billion times for her stupidity. She says in the above video, and I quote, "Breasts serve three purposes. They entice a man to sleep with you. They feed the babies that result from that. And then they just prove Newton's law of gravity."
WHAT?
That last one isn't even a purpose.
And then . . . LOOK AT WHAT SHE'S WEARING!!!
It's perfectly okay for her to dress provocatively on national television, but it's indecent for a woman to nurse her baby in public? She doesn't say that in the above segment, but it's a concept I've heard more than I care to. Women get ridiculed and berated on a daily basis, told to leave stores because "hey, lady! You can't do that in here! It's indecent!" What? Like HELL you say!
Her comment isn't even, I don't think, the most absurd one in the entire segment. The shmuck in the dress shirt at the end of the video comments that seeing a woman breastfeeding her three-year-old son at dinner "was like watching dwarf porn."
Double WHAT?
Wow. Just wow.
I honestly don't know what all the outrage is about. I, personally, think it's about goddamn time that the market encourages breastfeeding. They've got that ridiculous Baby Alive doll that eats and pees and poops. I also discovered that there's a baby doll named Baby Wee Wee who, if you ask me, is more disturbing than a baby doll that pretends to suckle at a pretend teat.
Hey, Stupid Bitch on Fox News! The penis has more than one function too! Should we be allowing our daughters to play with baby dolls with anatomically correct body parts that do as nature intended them to do?
Granted, I'm not sure if that doll is still on the market anymore, but hey.
One more video to share.
I ♥ Sara Gilbert, as I posted on facebook. But Leah Remini? I want to punch her in the face SO HARD too. The gagging? Really?
What I really don't get is how in America today women go out of their way to be "strong" feminists. Women are outraged when a man treats them like a sexual object, and yet take all that extra time and effort to make themselves appear sexually attractive. Botox. Breast implants. Tight, provocative clothing that shows as much cleavage as possible without exposing the nipple. Push-up bras. Skinny jeans. Cosmetics. Hair dye. Tons and tons of beauty products on the market. Emphasis after emphasis on breasts being a "sexual organ."
I don't even understand how the breasts are considered a sexual organ at all. They serve no actual purpose in the art of procreation. The eggs aren't stored in the mammary glands. Biologically, they provide no function until after a baby is born. Why are they so sexualized in our society? Why do people gasp in shock and awe, turn away in disgust and disapproval, whenever they see a women using her breasts as nature intended? TO FEED HER BABY!
Personally, I'd much prefer it if our future's children are brought up in a society where women are not viewed as sexual objects quite as strongly as they are now. I'd love it if men looked at a woman not because she has "HURR HURR BOOBIES" but with respect and appreciation for the female form.
God or Mother Nature, or whatever your belief in the origin of the human species may be, made breasts on females to lactate, to feed our offspring. Not to be ogled and fondled for man's (or woman's) pleasure.