Leave a comment

butterflybee260 October 2 2011, 18:00:12 UTC

....are we really doing this again?

Reply

ehs_wildcats October 2 2011, 18:23:27 UTC
i'm just addressing it since several people have mentioned it in comments. plus i like making charts.

Reply

babytakemy_hand October 2 2011, 18:29:36 UTC
i like your charts! I noticed in the LA pics that came up a few weeks ago it looked different but the pictures that have come up over the weekend, I don't see TOO much of a difference unless I REALLY stare

Reply

ehs_wildcats October 2 2011, 19:01:44 UTC
i really don't think there is *that* much of a difference either, but i do see it and it may be enough that it is noticeable and it would be a shame if it causes problems since it is easily preventable. and it has been brought up so i just addressed it. oh well :/

Reply

kleth October 2 2011, 18:27:09 UTC
I'm a little doubtful. I wasn't immediately struck by any dramatic face inflation. It may be there, but as an experienced photographer, I would want to see two photos taken with the same lighting, same angle, same distance, same focal length lens. "How fat is his face?" This is like the endless debate over "How tall is he?" A lot of the controversy is based on comparing photos, which are always taken at different angles, from different distances, and with different lighting. Photos taken under variable conditions simply aren't dispositive.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up