I have a confession to make. I don't like art galleries. I don't like putting a box around some things and calling them art. "Art" (or indeed "stuff") is more delightful when it's encountered by surprise. Provided, of course, that you notice it. Maybe galleries are so that people don't have to pay attention all the time in case they encounter
(
Read more... )
However dig deep enough and you end up passing through the realm of intersection between artist's intent and your ability to make the same connections. Then we may find ourselves falling back on our own perceptions, infusing the artist's construct with our own patterns and meanings. It is always possible to make connections that may seem obvious to you are impossibly abstract for someone not equipped with your precise knowledge and mindstate and the time of creation. Perhaps this then is the point where 'real' art is reached. Where the work is of sufficient richness to engage you to the point where you look for meaning but the creator's intention is sufficiently absent that you find out something for yourself rather than worrying if you have understood the art properly - always a rather unsatisfying outcome.
The vote/anarchy thing was awesome by the way.
Reply
And, thank you :)
Reply
Leave a comment