005. To lead humanity

Dec 28, 2009 14:59

While I don't condone the violent actions objectors have taken towards the Watch, I also don't approve of this witch hunt. What happened to the openness the Watch claimed it would maintain? They aren't even off the ground and already they are trying to suppress negative opinions ( Read more... )

ooc: anarchy whoohoo!, ooc: long time no see orz, ooc: omg i am being opressd!!111!, ooc: he's so subtle, ooc: i suck at being active, ooc: his point is lost in douchebaggery, ooc: the watch = a-laws i'm calling it, ooc: still prettier than you, ooc: rip yehuda, ooc: praise stop raping people, ooc: smackdown in 3 2 1, ooc: where's mai twinnie sob

Leave a comment

earth_uninstall January 3 2010, 02:13:48 UTC
[ooc: The hesitation continues.]

As long as it takes; for such a delicate operation, it shouldn't be pushed any more than is necessary. I will admit that I don't know exactly how to accomplish this task, but I do think a manner exists. The manuals would be written in the most straightforward manner possible, avoiding the mention of specific people by name to avoid bias towards them and keeping descriptions for all places and jobs to the same formula and sentence count. If everyone oversaw the process, it would create an environment where bribery or other such improbable actions would be easy to spot and those who would be prone to them would avoid doing so, due to the high chances of being caught. Should they still decide go through with it, they would, as I mentioned, be noticed and stopped.

No, it wouldn't. Gender is even more trivial.

I realize it's hypocritical, that what I feel does not always correspond to what I know is right. In my mind the ideal situation is that the people are logical and intellectual, and thus their rule would be just and practical.

That is easy enough to solve. All we would need to do is impose a format for all submitted ideas, such as a concise, bullet-point style, and the predominant use of facts over poetry. People would be able to make decision based on the merit of the idea instead of how well someone can write. To avoid recognition by handwriting, all ideas would be re-written by one person before being distributed. In terms of a committee, I'm not sure. I would have to think more on that matter, but I suspect having weekly meetings in the style of a forum would be my proposal.

To myself and my people, which means by proxy this world, because we are stuck in it.

-Aurora

Reply


Leave a comment

Up