While I don't condone the violent actions objectors have taken towards the Watch, I also don't approve of this witch hunt. What happened to the openness the Watch claimed it would maintain? They aren't even off the ground and already they are trying to suppress negative opinions
(
Read more... )
Reply
The only reason he rewrote that entry was to maintain his 'documentation' of what has been done to members of the Watch. That sounds like the beginning of a witch hunt to me.
-Aurora
Reply
It is documentation of crimes that have been committed. If the Scavengers had been targeted, the procedure would be the same.
Reply
Such behavior is unprecedented. We have no "procedure," not one that has been agreed upon and established. Because of that, by definition this is not lawful behavior.
-Aurora
Reply
That is what we are in the process of building. It is not the Watch's fault that the murderer and the beast-tamer did not conveniently wait until that was accomplished before killing Stoneface and sending wild animals after the Watch.
Reply
That the Watch is in the process of building. It is entirely the Watch's fault that I not only have very little faith in their ability to form acceptable laws, but to withhold from abusing the power they have given themselves.
-Aurora
Reply
If having our commander murdered and being assaulted ourselves has not hindered our resolve in this undertaking, why do you seem to believe that mere words will? You write prolifically, yet I have yet to see you back your opinions up with any action, whether it is an offer of assistance or a proposal of separate methods. I do not understand why you believe we should be subject to your opinions.
Reply
I have proposed numerous ideas in the past and debated, at length, with Stoneface. If you paid more attention to the journals then you wouldn't be so ignorant. What action do you think I should take? Have my own go at Stoneface? Hold someone hostage until my demands are met? Words and ideas are just as helpful than any bullet I could waste.
-Aurora
Reply
I have seen a great deal of ink expended, and I do not understand why you feel that everyone ought to [here the writing sloooooows] agree with
You automatically assign enmity to the Guard and the Watch, without seeming to be open to the possibility that we have Edensphere's best interests in mind. Why?
Reply
They are both organizations, ones that are heavily armed and populated with people chosen for their ability to fight, who have decided that they alone are the policing forces of Edensphere. They have given themselves authority either outside of their jurisdiction (the Guard is only meant to protect the Hatchery and the cocoons, nothing more) or created their own (the Watch, as suddenly all of Edensphere is their right and business).
If a member of the Guard or the Watch attacks someone, the one attacked must have been a criminal. If any other person attacks someone, the attacker must be a criminal. You do not see anything wrong, unjust, or dangerous about this growing mindset?
-Aurora
Reply
That is not so. If a Watch member was to attack someone for no cause, they would be ejected from the Watch and held accountable for their criminal act. I must ask you, have you ever spoken to any of us outside of the journals? I cannot tell if you are simply paranoid or if there is an underlying resentment to your apparently vehement feelings, as none of us are the corrupt and abusive beings you seem to think us.
Reply
Accountable by who? Who can determine what is and isn't a criminal act by the Watch? And what would speaking to the members of Watch accomplish? Are you hoping they could earn my sympathy and emotionally manipulate me into backing off? Their actions are speaking loud enough.
-Aurora
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment