Ebert says...
There is a film I like, it looks stunning and the editing is slick and good grief do you have to pay attention. It is called Push and it's better than it should be*. Ebert likes the acting and the cinematography but his failure to correctly keep track of the plot is evident (though I agree with him about the McGuffin)
That said if I didn't already want to go to sundance, this from the same critic would make me want to:
"Most of the movies that open every week are calculated financial investments made by people who expect to see a profit. Many of the smaller Sundance films are made by people who never expect to be able to pay them off. They make them because they are filled with a vision or a message, and want to share their experience. To see them is to participate in their lives. It is hard for a man to push a cart. It is easier when there are two men. Maybe Sundance is like the other guy, helping to push the cart."
*Bother and Drat, I've just found out Push is a comic too and now I have to find it*
*Done
That said if I didn't already want to go to sundance, this from the same critic would make me want to:
"Most of the movies that open every week are calculated financial investments made by people who expect to see a profit. Many of the smaller Sundance films are made by people who never expect to be able to pay them off. They make them because they are filled with a vision or a message, and want to share their experience. To see them is to participate in their lives. It is hard for a man to push a cart. It is easier when there are two men. Maybe Sundance is like the other guy, helping to push the cart."
*Bother and Drat, I've just found out Push is a comic too and now I have to find it*
*Done