All too often, we find that learned philosophers exercise great ingenuity to establish what they in fact all be began by agreeing to: the belief that rationality is that virtue best exemplified by philosophers
( Read more... )
Humm ... I don't recall it too clearly, but I think he was arguing against epiphenomenalism, but the other guy just tore him apart hardcore, I thought.
Yeah, actually, I read the rest of Existentialism, Emotions, and the Cultural Limits of Rationality today, and it was so disappointing. He very clearly announces what he's going to argue for, and it's a really interesting claim, and then he proceeds to give no argument at all for it. Or at least, I couldn't find one, and I was looking pretty carefully. Brr.
Reply
Reply
Reply
What did he argue at the talk you attended?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment