Current Sexual Ethics

Jan 26, 2010 18:27

Welcome to this week's edition of "Current Sexual Ethics With Dr. Jeff."

Dear Dr. Jeff,

J., that big-chinned bastard stole my audience and you know how it is, man? Some people just PERFORM (and I do mean perform) better with an audience, I mean, after an audience. Why else do you think Letterman kept all those interns around?

Me, I can live without a ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

java_fiend February 1 2010, 04:32:29 UTC
Okay, the thought of Max Baucus coupled with a happy ending just made me throw up in my mouth a little. Have you no compassion for those of us that just finished up dinner? Bleh!

This is awesome. lol... really enjoyable, fun read.

Reply

drippedonpaper February 1 2010, 06:36:44 UTC
I'm not sure anyone else caught who he is but he was carefully selected:)

I find it amusing that you find near vomiting enjoyable..but we aim to please.

To inducing many more puke-fests, the my repulsive writing in the future, I share a toast with you, LOL:)

Reply

java_fiend February 2 2010, 02:37:07 UTC
lol... and what criteria did you use to select such a foul beast? lol...

Well, some near-vomiting experiences are well worth it. This would be one of those times! :-)

Yes... cheers to that!

Reply

drippedonpaper February 2 2010, 02:54:29 UTC
I thought it would be best to use a senator and I tried to pick one that may have committed sexual misconduct because that...seemed more fair, if that makes sense. There are suspicions about him:

http://volokh.com/2009/12/05/baucus-scandal/

Also, because according to:

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wilmouth/2009/12/07/cnn-catches-baucus-scandal-labels-democrat

He is:

Baucus is a key figure in the health care debate. He is the chair of the Senate Finance Committee.

I obviously wanted to pick a senator that was involved with the health care debate as well.

I'm glad you enjoyed it. The brilliant idea was Jeff's and writing together was a lot of fun:)

Reply

java_fiend February 2 2010, 02:58:39 UTC
lol... impeccable reasoning. I just figured you were going for one of the most morally and personally repugnant people in the Senate. :-p

Or as Cher said... and I'm sure she was talking about either Baucus or Lieberman...

"I think... no, I am positive... that you are the most unattractive man I have ever met in my entire life. You know, in the short time we've been together, you have demonstrated EVERY loathsome characteristic of the male personality and even discovered a few new ones. You are physically repulsive, intellectually retarded, you're morally reprehensible, vulgar, insensitive, selfish, stupid, you have no taste, a lousy sense of humor and you smell. You're not even interesting enough to make me sick."

Reply

drippedonpaper February 2 2010, 03:23:10 UTC
That last line says it all doesn't it?:) One should at least be vomit-inducing:)

Reply

java_fiend February 2 2010, 03:25:13 UTC
LOL... indeed. :-)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up