Sheer Dumb Luck
Part Five
By
Dreaming of Everything AKA
dream_it_all AKA
dreams_of_all, betaed by
mmouse15Series: Transformers 2007
Ratings/Warnings: M for sex and possible language, plus sexual themes. Warnings for multiple partner scenes and themes, plug-and-play, slash. Updated G1 characters.
Characters/Pairings: Ratchet, Constructicons, Ratchet/Constructicons. (Yes, all of
(
Read more... )
Comments 14
(The comment has been removed)
As certain answers are revealed, more questions appear that keep me wondering.
Eeeee :D :D :D This is good because I am always afraid that I am making things ridiculously too obvious. (Except for sometimes when I think I'm making things ridiculously too obscure... >.>) But plots need something to keep you guessing, and--yay!
This time I'm very curious about Mixmaster - before, I was just curious how and when he'd make his appearance, and now that he has, my brain is trying to come up with why his "brothers" and Ratchet are so wary of him; also, what's up with his speech.
Mixmaster is totally my favorite. Except that Bonecrusher is more fun to write. And Scavenger is more adorable. And I identify more with Scrapper, except for the "crazy" bit. And Hook is so ridiculous that you can't help but love him. Okay, maybe I like them all, but Mixmaster is way, way up there. Like I might have mentioned, he shows up a lot more in the eventual ( ... )
Reply
(And because I forgot--would you mind if I friended you?)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Now that you mentioned it, I went back and compared the original TFC version to this. The italics really do make a difference in some of the passages.
“That’s just stupid. What do you think I am, a Decepticon? And I’m a medic. How stable are these?” as compared to “That’s just stupid. What do you think I am, a Decepticon? And I’m a medic. How stable are these?”..
It's interesting, going back in and catching the differences in emphasis. (:
Reply
Actually, that phrase you used as an example in particular is one of the things that bothered me most about where the italics got stripped out. >.> Most of them are inconsequential little differences, but that phrase just reads as wrong without the italics in there.
Reply
Ooooh! Telling little details again. Nice! <3
Eeeeee! Looking forward to more cuddly Constructicons!
Reply
...Cuddly Constructicons are pretty much my favorite thing ever. >.> It's true! I just love them to little itty-bitty pieces. One of the main reasons I am probably going to write a sequel to this (and one of the main features of said sequel) is cuddly Constructions. They are just awdorable!
Reply
Mixmaster should prove to be interesting. Yay, tactile Scavenger!
Reply
Mixmaster is probably my favorite. Scavenger is a close second, though! He is a cuddler. >.>
Reply
I like this series a lot!
Reply
Mixmaster is, as you have guessed, a mystery right now. One that will be resolved, but still! Actually, now I'm really excited about the eventual reveal. ^_^
Reply
Leave a comment