Latest Great Moments of the 20somethings
As a 20 something, I find it particularly annoying when one rises above and takes claim to their age as some great sage of wisdom for their time; thus making us look like dumbasses and we hide underneath our Zinn books in the community. As an ex-Journalism/Communications major, I am also pissed when people pass off obviously mindless dribble as journalistic blog effort.
My commentary on the top three posts made by rosephase 's blog appropriately named Philosophy of Non-Monogamy.
When someone emails you a question (firstly, WHY are people emailing you in the first place?!), answering with one sentence is snarky and dumb sounding. As a journalist, at least make an effort, really. Also, repeating yourself, will fall on deaf ears, not really get through.
When you are calling someone your cousin, not only is it NOT a word game, it's just dumb. And there is no such thing as "hot creepy." And again, more than three sentences, please? Actually try to articulate a thought. P.s: Who are these people emailing her?!?! I really hope they aren't asking for relationship advice, and thusly she'll be a guru.
Just because your one experience happened doesn't mean "rank" is somehow anything. I also hope that you eventually realize that those terms of primary, secondary, etc, are not about how much love is given to each person, but their "order" of coming into the relationship. At least, this may be the generally agreed upon definition. So words like primary, secondary, etc are horrible terms? That's a personal idea, mind you. So are you somehow insecure when you explain the concept of your relationship to other people? "Oh, well you see, I'm Jim's primary, and then Jill's the secondary, and our tertiary is Collin." If so, then I must be one hell of an insecure fuck.
Journalistic effort? You're doing it wrong.
Oh, and P.s: STOP WASTING INTERNET ON PICTURES THAT MAKE NO SENSE TO THE TOPIC!
Edit: Sorry! I spelled tertiary wrong.
My commentary on the top three posts made by rosephase 's blog appropriately named Philosophy of Non-Monogamy.
When someone emails you a question (firstly, WHY are people emailing you in the first place?!), answering with one sentence is snarky and dumb sounding. As a journalist, at least make an effort, really. Also, repeating yourself, will fall on deaf ears, not really get through.
When you are calling someone your cousin, not only is it NOT a word game, it's just dumb. And there is no such thing as "hot creepy." And again, more than three sentences, please? Actually try to articulate a thought. P.s: Who are these people emailing her?!?! I really hope they aren't asking for relationship advice, and thusly she'll be a guru.
Just because your one experience happened doesn't mean "rank" is somehow anything. I also hope that you eventually realize that those terms of primary, secondary, etc, are not about how much love is given to each person, but their "order" of coming into the relationship. At least, this may be the generally agreed upon definition. So words like primary, secondary, etc are horrible terms? That's a personal idea, mind you. So are you somehow insecure when you explain the concept of your relationship to other people? "Oh, well you see, I'm Jim's primary, and then Jill's the secondary, and our tertiary is Collin." If so, then I must be one hell of an insecure fuck.
Journalistic effort? You're doing it wrong.
Oh, and P.s: STOP WASTING INTERNET ON PICTURES THAT MAKE NO SENSE TO THE TOPIC!
Edit: Sorry! I spelled tertiary wrong.